![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: Page not moved: discussion shows alternative solution Ground Zero | t 01:23, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Room 39 →
Room 39 (North Korea) – See below.
Auric
talk 13:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Since the Royal Navy organization is far & away better known, this page should be moved, to, frex,
Room 39 (North Korea).
TREKphiler
any time you're ready, Uhura
02:52, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
This article links Kim Jong Un to Room 39, but most of the sources are dated before he came to power, and the article seems to be directed towards his father. Symptomatic of that, it says, "many claim that Room 39 is critical to Kim Jong-un's continued power", oblivious to the fact he died in 2011. There is a clear need for an update. Many references are roughly a decade old. Moreover, many of the key points made are not supported by any references. Overall, there is a lack of neutrality. Rather than a factual account, there is a series of accusations and speculations with an overall negative tone.-- Jack Upland ( talk) 11:22, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: Page not moved: discussion shows alternative solution Ground Zero | t 01:23, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Room 39 →
Room 39 (North Korea) – See below.
Auric
talk 13:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Since the Royal Navy organization is far & away better known, this page should be moved, to, frex,
Room 39 (North Korea).
TREKphiler
any time you're ready, Uhura
02:52, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
This article links Kim Jong Un to Room 39, but most of the sources are dated before he came to power, and the article seems to be directed towards his father. Symptomatic of that, it says, "many claim that Room 39 is critical to Kim Jong-un's continued power", oblivious to the fact he died in 2011. There is a clear need for an update. Many references are roughly a decade old. Moreover, many of the key points made are not supported by any references. Overall, there is a lack of neutrality. Rather than a factual account, there is a series of accusations and speculations with an overall negative tone.-- Jack Upland ( talk) 11:22, 28 June 2018 (UTC)