![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Romance languages was copied or moved into Romance languages linguistics with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article comes from a split of Romance languages. I wasn’t sure how to call it so I just gave it the current title, but maybe we can find a better one. Same goes for the lead section, and the article might also need some restructuring, adding references etc. -- SynConlanger ( talk) 07:15, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
I propose moving this page to "Linguistics of Romance languages". It seems to me like a more natural title in English. Also the present title should probably be "Romance languages' linguistics", but I am not sure. I think my proposed title would be clearer. -- Ritchie92 ( talk) 10:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Romance Linguistics is a field of study -- like Economics or Anthropology -- not a label indicating description of linguistic features of Romance languages. I don't know if the format meets Wikipedia norms, but an accurate title would be something like Romance Languages: Linguistic features. Barefoot through the chollas ( talk) 22:54, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
"Romanian was influenced by Slavic phonology, most notably in the palatalization of consonants in the plural form (for example pomi [pomʲ] and lupi [lupʲ])." But the transcriptions [pomʲ] and [lupʲ] indicate no palatalization of consonants. Barefoot through the chollas ( talk) 18:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Romance languages was copied or moved into Romance languages linguistics with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article comes from a split of Romance languages. I wasn’t sure how to call it so I just gave it the current title, but maybe we can find a better one. Same goes for the lead section, and the article might also need some restructuring, adding references etc. -- SynConlanger ( talk) 07:15, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
I propose moving this page to "Linguistics of Romance languages". It seems to me like a more natural title in English. Also the present title should probably be "Romance languages' linguistics", but I am not sure. I think my proposed title would be clearer. -- Ritchie92 ( talk) 10:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Romance Linguistics is a field of study -- like Economics or Anthropology -- not a label indicating description of linguistic features of Romance languages. I don't know if the format meets Wikipedia norms, but an accurate title would be something like Romance Languages: Linguistic features. Barefoot through the chollas ( talk) 22:54, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
"Romanian was influenced by Slavic phonology, most notably in the palatalization of consonants in the plural form (for example pomi [pomʲ] and lupi [lupʲ])." But the transcriptions [pomʲ] and [lupʲ] indicate no palatalization of consonants. Barefoot through the chollas ( talk) 18:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)