![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm not convinced that the scrolls controversy should be reported here (there are articles about the scrolls themselves where it would no doubt be appropriate). However if we do report it, using the term "was criticised by some arab scholars" isn't accurate reporting. One head of antiquities described the acquisition as a theft, in a controversy that was more about politics than scholarship. -- Tony Sidaway 14:24, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
If The Rockefeller Museum is located in East Jerusalem it is not technically located in Israel. The text clearly says [...]museum located in Jerusalem, Israel [...] that is outside Israel. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Magnus Widman (
talk •
contribs)
00:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Jiujitsuguy, why did you revert me here: [1] and ad a category for "Archaeology museums in Israel" for this article when its not located in Israel? -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 04:14, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
For the record, the Palestine Post called it "Palestine Archaeological Museum" 303 times and "Rockefeller Museum" 55 times (once even in the same article). Both names existed even before the museum opened to the public. Zero talk 14:30, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
The Imperial Museum of Antiquities (1901–1917) couldn't be "housed" in a building which was only erected 2 decades after the demise of the Ottomans.
It must be clarified if indeed the Ottoman museum's collection did end up in the new museum, and in general if and in which way the two are connected.
I don't have the time to read the source article in full, and it lacks a short overview or "Conclusion" section. Arminden ( talk) 07:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
'Israeli liberation of Judea and Samaria' seems a ridiculously partisan way to describe the events of 1967 and not up to standards 176.29.167.167 ( talk) 09:03, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm not convinced that the scrolls controversy should be reported here (there are articles about the scrolls themselves where it would no doubt be appropriate). However if we do report it, using the term "was criticised by some arab scholars" isn't accurate reporting. One head of antiquities described the acquisition as a theft, in a controversy that was more about politics than scholarship. -- Tony Sidaway 14:24, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
If The Rockefeller Museum is located in East Jerusalem it is not technically located in Israel. The text clearly says [...]museum located in Jerusalem, Israel [...] that is outside Israel. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Magnus Widman (
talk •
contribs)
00:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Jiujitsuguy, why did you revert me here: [1] and ad a category for "Archaeology museums in Israel" for this article when its not located in Israel? -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 04:14, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
For the record, the Palestine Post called it "Palestine Archaeological Museum" 303 times and "Rockefeller Museum" 55 times (once even in the same article). Both names existed even before the museum opened to the public. Zero talk 14:30, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
The Imperial Museum of Antiquities (1901–1917) couldn't be "housed" in a building which was only erected 2 decades after the demise of the Ottomans.
It must be clarified if indeed the Ottoman museum's collection did end up in the new museum, and in general if and in which way the two are connected.
I don't have the time to read the source article in full, and it lacks a short overview or "Conclusion" section. Arminden ( talk) 07:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
'Israeli liberation of Judea and Samaria' seems a ridiculously partisan way to describe the events of 1967 and not up to standards 176.29.167.167 ( talk) 09:03, 6 September 2023 (UTC)