This article was nominated for deletion on 27 June 2020. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This page only gives links to itself. It gives no sources, and is just self-advertising. There is no notability at all. Joerger, check what counts as a source before removing the no citations template. It even includes a link to what is a reliable source. 65.5.182.94 ( talk) 07:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Repeted Deletion of RFL Chart
User 66.71.9.156 has repeatedly deleted the chart of RFL sanctioned matches, claiming that the chart is outdated. The chart is based on the most recent data from the official RFL website. I requested that user 66.71.9.156 provde a source for the more recent data they claim exists so that I might update the chart, but the user once again deleted the chart, this time without comment.
I have opened a request for moderator assistance, and I would welcome any useful input user 66.71.9.156 might provide.
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 June 2020. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This page only gives links to itself. It gives no sources, and is just self-advertising. There is no notability at all. Joerger, check what counts as a source before removing the no citations template. It even includes a link to what is a reliable source. 65.5.182.94 ( talk) 07:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Repeted Deletion of RFL Chart
User 66.71.9.156 has repeatedly deleted the chart of RFL sanctioned matches, claiming that the chart is outdated. The chart is based on the most recent data from the official RFL website. I requested that user 66.71.9.156 provde a source for the more recent data they claim exists so that I might update the chart, but the user once again deleted the chart, this time without comment.
I have opened a request for moderator assistance, and I would welcome any useful input user 66.71.9.156 might provide.