This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Robinho article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Unable to edit the main page due tot he security settings: http://blogs.bettor.com/Robinho-signs-for-Besiktas-a22406 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.219.132.84 ( talk) 13:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Has anyone thought of extending the article, the player deserves a better one than this —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bulkroosh ( talk • contribs) 21:10, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
First of all I'd like to point out, that personaly I don't have a specific opinion on the issue of his age. Apparently as some users claimed he stated on "Real Madrid TV" he was 19 making his year of birth 1988. Official sources (and that's still what counts on Wikipedia) state his year of birth as 1984 (which currently makes him 23).
Unless the official sources get changed (which I highly doubt) he was born in 1984. This is what the Wikipedia article has to reflect, nothing else.
About the reasons for claiming to be only 19 one can only speculate. However it's likely that in a sport where with 30 people think your pretty old there is a tendency to make oneself younger (a lot of stars as well as normal people do that when stating their age).
But just because you wish to be 19 doesn't mean you actualy are. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, we deal in facts, not in wishes.
1redrun
Talk 10:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
FIFA.COM lists his birthdate as 25/01/1984 (Jan 25, 1984) when listing Brazil's roster for the 2006 World Cup. I don't know if this is documentation enough or not, but 1988 is clearly wrong. If he was born in 1988, he would have been 14 when he was an instrumental player in Santos' National Championship run in the fall or 2002... Galen13 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Galen13 ( talk • contribs) 18:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
It`s not necessary to add it to the article but some sites/newspapers, especially the Brazilian football news site Futebol do Interior [1] nickname him Ingrato (ungrateful one) [2] because he turned his back to Santos when he was trying to leave the club to join Real Madrid. He intentionally missed 1 month of training and Brazilian League matches during that period. PMLF 05:24, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Although real madrid are the best team in the world because of the 9 champion league record i think they should play robinho right wing. His creativity, pace and STEP-OVERS will really help him, it will also help him to get into the brazil squad because brazil are known to make a lot of world class strikers and they lack right mids. David Beckham aint really doing that well playing right mid, i saw robinho play, he's got good crosses which is very usefull there.
I deleted this because it's 100% false. With 17 years old Pele won the world cup and was considered the best player in the world. A 19 year old Maradona was not even called for the 78 world cup.
What happened to all the external links? some of the websites had very informative pieces which complimented the article. Can somebody help me put them back?
It says he joined his fellow Brazilians including Cicinho, who didnt arrive until 6 months After Robinho.
The result of the debate was no consensus to move — Mets501 ( talk) 03:58, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Robson de Souza → Robinho or Robinho Paulista — Someone moved the page because the name Robinho not unique. But the currently Real Madrid player famous enough to just shorten to one word likes Ronaldo. Matthew_hk t c 11:38, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Oppose - Better to leave at his actual name, unless he is only known by the nickname. Certainly that "Paulista" is wrong. -- Beardo 16:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Support - Brazilian soccer players go by one name and in the context of the world game, Robinho refers only to one individual, the one in question. If in the future there are other Robinho's, in Brazilian fashion they will get something added to distinguish them (i.e. Ronaldinho Gaucho, Juninho Pernanbucano, etc). Galen13 15:55, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Is the São Vicente where Robinho was born in the São Paulo state or the one in Rio Grande do Norte? I am assuming São Paulo. Can someone confirm this and make the change? Galen13 16:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
His stats for the 2006-07 season don't add up correctly.
I have found no info on the Net about Robinho moving to Arsenal in exchange for Reyes. I think the last part in the Media coverage about this should be removed as there are no sources mentioned about this. Grahambo2005 11:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 08:43, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Some writers decided that Robinho's era in Real Madrid had already ended. And to our surprise, Robinho eventually stays in Madrid. What can you say about that? (I'm talking about previous versions that stated in the template that Robinho's part in Madrid is from 2005 to 2008) HaGamal 20:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
A Source In Spanish But Pretty Clear Stating That He Has Gone To Man City [3] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whittlepedia ( talk • contribs) 22:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Just because a club has an agreement to sell a player doesn't make him transferred already. The player has to sign a contract with the new club. There's no proof yet that Robinho has agreed to sign with Manchester City. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.100.18.77 (
talk) 22:36, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Hasnt gone yet, window shut, no announcement. makes him a real madrid player in my eyes. revert? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.56.125.24 ( talk) 23:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
He's signed, but it says "playing for Manchester City" which is not correct - he hasn't done so yet. He has signed for them but has not yet played for them. 91.108.16.194 ( talk) 23:13, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Please only used sourced information, especially at a time such as this, when lots of people will be visiting the page, and Wikipedia should seek to maintain its highest standards. Yohan euan o4 ( talk) 23:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Why have we got all these in the team names? It seems a bit redundant for an article that is unmistakably about football. People normally just say Santos, Real Madrid, Chelsea, and Manchester City, and it's unambiguous enough. Rameses The Ram ( talk) 22:25, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
since any talk of wages is speculative, should this be included? i keep deleting it but it keeps popping back up....... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.2.19.50 ( talk) 22:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
On the personal information box it says:
Santos - 104 appearances, 44 goals Real Madrid - 109 appearances, 36 goals Manchester City - 16 appearances, 11 goals
However at the "Statistics" bit it says:
In the league: Real Madrid - 101 appearances, 25 goals
One of them must be wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.41.202.111 ( talk) 17:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Isn't this vandalism? Robinho is one of those exceptional players who has an unrelentingly creative command of the ball at his feet, a rhythmic freedom of movement known in Brazil as 'GINGA', a gifted first touch and eye for goal, and the compelling audacity to enroll any defenders who face him in his personal 'fantasy futbol' clinic.
It was added quite recently too. I'd get rid of it but I'm not sure. Spiderone ( talk) 14:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Information needs to be added about his form from August 2009 to January 2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.194.152 ( talk) 17:04, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
The article is not correct. The part that describes his move in the summer of 2008 is false or at the very least not verified and MUST be edited because it provides misleading information.
Firstly, about his contract, Real Madrid management tried to renew his contract but the two parties couldn't agree cause Madrid weren't willing to triple (!) his wage. Robinho demanded that wage cause he had talked with Chelsea who had promised him that contract. That's how the whole summer saga started. Madrid wouldn't bulk under the pressure unless Robinho came out publicly to demand an exit. The whole exchange deal for Ronaldo was a story written by Marca, a story that was never verified and chances are it was a fabrication whose purpose was to decrease Calderon's popularity.
After the "I want to leave" statements, there was absolutely no chance Robinho would play for Real Madrid again, he instantly became a traitor to many Madridistas and was even verbally attacked by fans. At the final week of the transfer period everyone was convinced Madrid and Chelsea would agree on the amount but that didn't happen for various reasons. In the very final hours of the transfer period Manchester City made an unexpected offer of 42 millions euro (40 of them cash!) that Madrid instantly accepted and so did Robinho who had no other option really. The whole deal happened so late that the contract was signed before even Robinho got the chance to pass a medical test. A few days later Robinho sacked his agent, a clear indication that the Brazilian was very upset at the final turn of events. He went from playing for the most successful football club in the world to playing for a club that hardly anyone knew outside Britain. All that after having his best season ever. Rumor has it, Robinho thought he had signed for Manchester United before finding out there was another club in Manchester. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.210.253.7 ( talk) 18:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
I added a small detail in his personal life section about his arrest for serious sexual assault and the decision of the police not to charge him, citing his management spokesperson during the time. It was a small detail, but I felt it worth noting. Reference to his spokesperson at this important time have been removed, but can we not find a form of phraseology that is acceptable to all? He is a public figure, it was cited repeatedly in the press and is worth noting. ( JaySorrels ( talk) 19:13, 18 May 2010 (UTC)).
definitely the writer is not Brazilian, has a lack of knowledge of Robinho's career... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.6.44.252 ( talk) 04:53, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Can that really be considered true? When was the last time he played for them and indeed, will he ever? Feudonym ( talk) 05:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
http://www.santosfc.com.br/futebol/elenco/jogador.asp?i=1
Brasileiro 2010 (Santos FC) 2 jogos 0 gols
Paulista 2010 (Santos FC) 12 jogos 5 gols
Paulista is the state tournament. As wiki only counts the national leagues then he then only played 2 games and zero goals in 2010. Thats from the official Santos FC website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.54.47.246 ( talk) 06:37, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Who was the idiot that removed Robinho's Paulista stats? He score way more than 11 goals in 21 apps in 2010.
Whoever did the Stats for Neymar and Paolo Henrique should come and do it for Robinho: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neymar_da_Silva http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulo_Henrique_Chagas_de_Lima —Preceding unsigned comment added by PrescriptionDeath ( talk • contribs) 11:58, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
I agree that was stupid. 74.13.85.220 ( talk) 15:17, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Shouldn't it be [ʁuˈbĩɲu] really? Or is [xoˈbĩj̃u] specific to where he was born/brought up? Stephen MUFC ( talk) 14:27, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
That cheap? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.210.34.33 ( talk) 22:03, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
change the article perfil image 190.150.35.182 ( talk) 23:57, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Robinho. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:49, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
oh hi there, i would introducing new images for the article. To give it a better look in this 2017. If they agree, well, if not, no problem. Just revert it, but please, let me know if it's not too much to ask — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brazilianjogobonito ( talk • contribs) 01:56, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Well, reverted to pre-breaking event version and was going to protect to allow a discussion to unfold. Was partially protected, so I guess y'all can sort it out after all. -- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 19:46, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, just one thing: in Italy "a defendant shall be considered not guilty until a final sentence has been passed" (Article 27 of the Constitution). It's not a technicality. There will certainly be an appeal trial, which is a real new trial, and therefore the judgment of the Court of Cassation. This is just to say that defining Robinho in the incipit as a sex offender, identifying him in the same way of the footballer, is largely exaggerated and, to date, is certainly out of place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.246.80.104 ( talk) 21:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Robinho. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.robinhoofficial.com.br/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:31, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
"is a Brazilian professional footballer who plays a forward for Santos" Shouldn't it say, "is a Brazilian professional footballer who plays a forward for Santos and convicted rapist" until he faces the courts in Italy? I mean he's as much a convicted rapist as he is a "professioneal footballer". One is at least real while the other is kicking a plastic object around. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.73.33.20 ( talk) 12:33, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Robinho article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Unable to edit the main page due tot he security settings: http://blogs.bettor.com/Robinho-signs-for-Besiktas-a22406 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.219.132.84 ( talk) 13:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Has anyone thought of extending the article, the player deserves a better one than this —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bulkroosh ( talk • contribs) 21:10, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
First of all I'd like to point out, that personaly I don't have a specific opinion on the issue of his age. Apparently as some users claimed he stated on "Real Madrid TV" he was 19 making his year of birth 1988. Official sources (and that's still what counts on Wikipedia) state his year of birth as 1984 (which currently makes him 23).
Unless the official sources get changed (which I highly doubt) he was born in 1984. This is what the Wikipedia article has to reflect, nothing else.
About the reasons for claiming to be only 19 one can only speculate. However it's likely that in a sport where with 30 people think your pretty old there is a tendency to make oneself younger (a lot of stars as well as normal people do that when stating their age).
But just because you wish to be 19 doesn't mean you actualy are. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, we deal in facts, not in wishes.
1redrun
Talk 10:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
FIFA.COM lists his birthdate as 25/01/1984 (Jan 25, 1984) when listing Brazil's roster for the 2006 World Cup. I don't know if this is documentation enough or not, but 1988 is clearly wrong. If he was born in 1988, he would have been 14 when he was an instrumental player in Santos' National Championship run in the fall or 2002... Galen13 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Galen13 ( talk • contribs) 18:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
It`s not necessary to add it to the article but some sites/newspapers, especially the Brazilian football news site Futebol do Interior [1] nickname him Ingrato (ungrateful one) [2] because he turned his back to Santos when he was trying to leave the club to join Real Madrid. He intentionally missed 1 month of training and Brazilian League matches during that period. PMLF 05:24, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Although real madrid are the best team in the world because of the 9 champion league record i think they should play robinho right wing. His creativity, pace and STEP-OVERS will really help him, it will also help him to get into the brazil squad because brazil are known to make a lot of world class strikers and they lack right mids. David Beckham aint really doing that well playing right mid, i saw robinho play, he's got good crosses which is very usefull there.
I deleted this because it's 100% false. With 17 years old Pele won the world cup and was considered the best player in the world. A 19 year old Maradona was not even called for the 78 world cup.
What happened to all the external links? some of the websites had very informative pieces which complimented the article. Can somebody help me put them back?
It says he joined his fellow Brazilians including Cicinho, who didnt arrive until 6 months After Robinho.
The result of the debate was no consensus to move — Mets501 ( talk) 03:58, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Robson de Souza → Robinho or Robinho Paulista — Someone moved the page because the name Robinho not unique. But the currently Real Madrid player famous enough to just shorten to one word likes Ronaldo. Matthew_hk t c 11:38, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Oppose - Better to leave at his actual name, unless he is only known by the nickname. Certainly that "Paulista" is wrong. -- Beardo 16:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Support - Brazilian soccer players go by one name and in the context of the world game, Robinho refers only to one individual, the one in question. If in the future there are other Robinho's, in Brazilian fashion they will get something added to distinguish them (i.e. Ronaldinho Gaucho, Juninho Pernanbucano, etc). Galen13 15:55, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Is the São Vicente where Robinho was born in the São Paulo state or the one in Rio Grande do Norte? I am assuming São Paulo. Can someone confirm this and make the change? Galen13 16:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
His stats for the 2006-07 season don't add up correctly.
I have found no info on the Net about Robinho moving to Arsenal in exchange for Reyes. I think the last part in the Media coverage about this should be removed as there are no sources mentioned about this. Grahambo2005 11:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 08:43, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Some writers decided that Robinho's era in Real Madrid had already ended. And to our surprise, Robinho eventually stays in Madrid. What can you say about that? (I'm talking about previous versions that stated in the template that Robinho's part in Madrid is from 2005 to 2008) HaGamal 20:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
A Source In Spanish But Pretty Clear Stating That He Has Gone To Man City [3] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whittlepedia ( talk • contribs) 22:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Just because a club has an agreement to sell a player doesn't make him transferred already. The player has to sign a contract with the new club. There's no proof yet that Robinho has agreed to sign with Manchester City. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.100.18.77 (
talk) 22:36, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Hasnt gone yet, window shut, no announcement. makes him a real madrid player in my eyes. revert? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.56.125.24 ( talk) 23:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
He's signed, but it says "playing for Manchester City" which is not correct - he hasn't done so yet. He has signed for them but has not yet played for them. 91.108.16.194 ( talk) 23:13, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Please only used sourced information, especially at a time such as this, when lots of people will be visiting the page, and Wikipedia should seek to maintain its highest standards. Yohan euan o4 ( talk) 23:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Why have we got all these in the team names? It seems a bit redundant for an article that is unmistakably about football. People normally just say Santos, Real Madrid, Chelsea, and Manchester City, and it's unambiguous enough. Rameses The Ram ( talk) 22:25, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
since any talk of wages is speculative, should this be included? i keep deleting it but it keeps popping back up....... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.2.19.50 ( talk) 22:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
On the personal information box it says:
Santos - 104 appearances, 44 goals Real Madrid - 109 appearances, 36 goals Manchester City - 16 appearances, 11 goals
However at the "Statistics" bit it says:
In the league: Real Madrid - 101 appearances, 25 goals
One of them must be wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.41.202.111 ( talk) 17:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Isn't this vandalism? Robinho is one of those exceptional players who has an unrelentingly creative command of the ball at his feet, a rhythmic freedom of movement known in Brazil as 'GINGA', a gifted first touch and eye for goal, and the compelling audacity to enroll any defenders who face him in his personal 'fantasy futbol' clinic.
It was added quite recently too. I'd get rid of it but I'm not sure. Spiderone ( talk) 14:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Information needs to be added about his form from August 2009 to January 2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.194.152 ( talk) 17:04, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
The article is not correct. The part that describes his move in the summer of 2008 is false or at the very least not verified and MUST be edited because it provides misleading information.
Firstly, about his contract, Real Madrid management tried to renew his contract but the two parties couldn't agree cause Madrid weren't willing to triple (!) his wage. Robinho demanded that wage cause he had talked with Chelsea who had promised him that contract. That's how the whole summer saga started. Madrid wouldn't bulk under the pressure unless Robinho came out publicly to demand an exit. The whole exchange deal for Ronaldo was a story written by Marca, a story that was never verified and chances are it was a fabrication whose purpose was to decrease Calderon's popularity.
After the "I want to leave" statements, there was absolutely no chance Robinho would play for Real Madrid again, he instantly became a traitor to many Madridistas and was even verbally attacked by fans. At the final week of the transfer period everyone was convinced Madrid and Chelsea would agree on the amount but that didn't happen for various reasons. In the very final hours of the transfer period Manchester City made an unexpected offer of 42 millions euro (40 of them cash!) that Madrid instantly accepted and so did Robinho who had no other option really. The whole deal happened so late that the contract was signed before even Robinho got the chance to pass a medical test. A few days later Robinho sacked his agent, a clear indication that the Brazilian was very upset at the final turn of events. He went from playing for the most successful football club in the world to playing for a club that hardly anyone knew outside Britain. All that after having his best season ever. Rumor has it, Robinho thought he had signed for Manchester United before finding out there was another club in Manchester. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.210.253.7 ( talk) 18:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
I added a small detail in his personal life section about his arrest for serious sexual assault and the decision of the police not to charge him, citing his management spokesperson during the time. It was a small detail, but I felt it worth noting. Reference to his spokesperson at this important time have been removed, but can we not find a form of phraseology that is acceptable to all? He is a public figure, it was cited repeatedly in the press and is worth noting. ( JaySorrels ( talk) 19:13, 18 May 2010 (UTC)).
definitely the writer is not Brazilian, has a lack of knowledge of Robinho's career... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.6.44.252 ( talk) 04:53, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Can that really be considered true? When was the last time he played for them and indeed, will he ever? Feudonym ( talk) 05:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
http://www.santosfc.com.br/futebol/elenco/jogador.asp?i=1
Brasileiro 2010 (Santos FC) 2 jogos 0 gols
Paulista 2010 (Santos FC) 12 jogos 5 gols
Paulista is the state tournament. As wiki only counts the national leagues then he then only played 2 games and zero goals in 2010. Thats from the official Santos FC website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.54.47.246 ( talk) 06:37, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Who was the idiot that removed Robinho's Paulista stats? He score way more than 11 goals in 21 apps in 2010.
Whoever did the Stats for Neymar and Paolo Henrique should come and do it for Robinho: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neymar_da_Silva http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulo_Henrique_Chagas_de_Lima —Preceding unsigned comment added by PrescriptionDeath ( talk • contribs) 11:58, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
I agree that was stupid. 74.13.85.220 ( talk) 15:17, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Shouldn't it be [ʁuˈbĩɲu] really? Or is [xoˈbĩj̃u] specific to where he was born/brought up? Stephen MUFC ( talk) 14:27, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
That cheap? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.210.34.33 ( talk) 22:03, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
change the article perfil image 190.150.35.182 ( talk) 23:57, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Robinho. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:49, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
oh hi there, i would introducing new images for the article. To give it a better look in this 2017. If they agree, well, if not, no problem. Just revert it, but please, let me know if it's not too much to ask — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brazilianjogobonito ( talk • contribs) 01:56, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Well, reverted to pre-breaking event version and was going to protect to allow a discussion to unfold. Was partially protected, so I guess y'all can sort it out after all. -- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 19:46, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, just one thing: in Italy "a defendant shall be considered not guilty until a final sentence has been passed" (Article 27 of the Constitution). It's not a technicality. There will certainly be an appeal trial, which is a real new trial, and therefore the judgment of the Court of Cassation. This is just to say that defining Robinho in the incipit as a sex offender, identifying him in the same way of the footballer, is largely exaggerated and, to date, is certainly out of place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.246.80.104 ( talk) 21:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Robinho. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.robinhoofficial.com.br/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:31, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
"is a Brazilian professional footballer who plays a forward for Santos" Shouldn't it say, "is a Brazilian professional footballer who plays a forward for Santos and convicted rapist" until he faces the courts in Italy? I mean he's as much a convicted rapist as he is a "professioneal footballer". One is at least real while the other is kicking a plastic object around. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.73.33.20 ( talk) 12:33, 13 October 2020 (UTC)