This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What does the doll look like? Are there any suitably licensed photos for Wikipedia to use? 86.174.188.81 ( talk) 22:31, 31 January 2013 (UTC) There is a photo of Robert on his Wikipedia page, but he curses everyone who takes a pic of him without his permission, so pray that whoever took the pic on the page asked permission first.
Somebody got cursed for your photo. I hope you're happy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.91.202.208 ( talk) 20:03, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Interview where Don Mancini, creator of the Child's Play franchise, says that "Chucky" was inspired by earlier films and not "Robert", and was not originally written as being a 'voodoo' doll:
How do you put a picture on the Wikipedia page?🤨 Ballora minicreepa ( talk) 04:46, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
This article isn't very developed and is missing a tone of information on its subject including it's history, and references in popular culture which need to be added to the article.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 14:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
This article is not very detailed when it comes to the doll's history. Might consider expanding t as well as the above mentioned info.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 22:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
I suggest this page be protected. There's a growing edit war of people trying to add a section about films based on the doll, and it seems consensus is to have no such section 134340Goat ( talk) 03:18, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Just had to do so again. I've now alerted an admin to the situation.
134340Goat (
talk) 02:22, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
We should add a section either here or in the article itself for users to apologize for looking at this photo of Robert without his express permission. It's known that bad things happen to people who do and neglect to apologize. 2600:1017:B125:79A4:D53A:14C2:B7D1:ECCB ( talk) 22:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Tajotep has added an infobox to this article. I'm not sure this is desirable. The infobox doesn't really convey a lot of information, and I think "infobox toy" is intended for a kind of toy (like "Rubik's Cube" or a particular Lego set), not a specific individual toy. The "Company" field looks a bit out of place in this case. Pinkbeast ( talk) 00:14, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
What is the scientific source for this legend? Are you sure it was not made by the firm who exhibited the doll? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.51.235 ( talk) 08:22, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
The citations are not really to WP:Reliable sources. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 14:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
All information within the update I attempted to publish is backed by credible and independent sources. The WP:FRIND sources you listed...No, the sources I listed were not WP:FRIND. They were examples of what are not credible or independent sources, and your edits intentionally or unintentionally were lending credibility to supernatural claims. This tells me you may have a problem with English comprehension or some other issue. Editing WP:FRINGE topics such as supposedly haunted dolls can be a steep learning curve (see WP:NOTNEUTRAL). I suggest you start editing articles about some noncontroversial topic to familiarize yourself with the encyclopedia's polices before you attempt to improve WP:FRINGE articles. Thanks. - LuckyLouie ( talk) 15:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What does the doll look like? Are there any suitably licensed photos for Wikipedia to use? 86.174.188.81 ( talk) 22:31, 31 January 2013 (UTC) There is a photo of Robert on his Wikipedia page, but he curses everyone who takes a pic of him without his permission, so pray that whoever took the pic on the page asked permission first.
Somebody got cursed for your photo. I hope you're happy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.91.202.208 ( talk) 20:03, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Interview where Don Mancini, creator of the Child's Play franchise, says that "Chucky" was inspired by earlier films and not "Robert", and was not originally written as being a 'voodoo' doll:
How do you put a picture on the Wikipedia page?🤨 Ballora minicreepa ( talk) 04:46, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
This article isn't very developed and is missing a tone of information on its subject including it's history, and references in popular culture which need to be added to the article.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 14:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
This article is not very detailed when it comes to the doll's history. Might consider expanding t as well as the above mentioned info.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 22:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
I suggest this page be protected. There's a growing edit war of people trying to add a section about films based on the doll, and it seems consensus is to have no such section 134340Goat ( talk) 03:18, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Just had to do so again. I've now alerted an admin to the situation.
134340Goat (
talk) 02:22, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
We should add a section either here or in the article itself for users to apologize for looking at this photo of Robert without his express permission. It's known that bad things happen to people who do and neglect to apologize. 2600:1017:B125:79A4:D53A:14C2:B7D1:ECCB ( talk) 22:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Tajotep has added an infobox to this article. I'm not sure this is desirable. The infobox doesn't really convey a lot of information, and I think "infobox toy" is intended for a kind of toy (like "Rubik's Cube" or a particular Lego set), not a specific individual toy. The "Company" field looks a bit out of place in this case. Pinkbeast ( talk) 00:14, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
What is the scientific source for this legend? Are you sure it was not made by the firm who exhibited the doll? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.51.235 ( talk) 08:22, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
The citations are not really to WP:Reliable sources. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 14:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
All information within the update I attempted to publish is backed by credible and independent sources. The WP:FRIND sources you listed...No, the sources I listed were not WP:FRIND. They were examples of what are not credible or independent sources, and your edits intentionally or unintentionally were lending credibility to supernatural claims. This tells me you may have a problem with English comprehension or some other issue. Editing WP:FRINGE topics such as supposedly haunted dolls can be a steep learning curve (see WP:NOTNEUTRAL). I suggest you start editing articles about some noncontroversial topic to familiarize yourself with the encyclopedia's polices before you attempt to improve WP:FRINGE articles. Thanks. - LuckyLouie ( talk) 15:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)