Grabbing for a review shortly.
Miyagawa (
talk) 10:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Ok, let's get this going.
Lead: Pipe a link for watershed through to
drainage basin
Done.
Change 3000 to 3,500 - purely because it made me do a double take when you then mention the year 2000 in the same sentence. Same issue with the line under Watershed.
Done.
Link
Quakers, as well as the various things in the sentence beginning "Claystones"
Move the link to
limestone to the previous paragraph, as you've currently got the second mention linked
Done.
I'd merge the last two paragraphs of the section, since one is a single seven word sentence. Just delete the line breaks and it'll be fine.
Done.
Watershed: I'd merge the second and third paragraphs, since like the last section, there's a single sentence paragraph there.
Merged the second with the first instead, seemed to belong better there.
History: Could "Their lengths are 64.0 feet (19.5 m) and 46.9 feet (14.3 m) and the first was repaired in 2011." be re-written to avoid the two "and"s?
Done.
Cite #3: You've got the publisher in the author section.
It was actually written by an organization, not an individual person, as is the case with a lot of those kinds of documents.
Other cites - you see to be missing publisher details on a few. You've got the author and the title, but no publisher.
Done.
I think that's everything. Placing on hold for seven days.
Miyagawa (
talk) 21:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)reply
@
Miyagawa: That should be everything now. --Jakob (
talk) aka Jakec 18:05, 18 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Great, happy to promote to GA on that basis.
Miyagawa (
talk) 19:00, 18 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Grabbing for a review shortly.
Miyagawa (
talk) 10:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Ok, let's get this going.
Lead: Pipe a link for watershed through to
drainage basin
Done.
Change 3000 to 3,500 - purely because it made me do a double take when you then mention the year 2000 in the same sentence. Same issue with the line under Watershed.
Done.
Link
Quakers, as well as the various things in the sentence beginning "Claystones"
Move the link to
limestone to the previous paragraph, as you've currently got the second mention linked
Done.
I'd merge the last two paragraphs of the section, since one is a single seven word sentence. Just delete the line breaks and it'll be fine.
Done.
Watershed: I'd merge the second and third paragraphs, since like the last section, there's a single sentence paragraph there.
Merged the second with the first instead, seemed to belong better there.
History: Could "Their lengths are 64.0 feet (19.5 m) and 46.9 feet (14.3 m) and the first was repaired in 2011." be re-written to avoid the two "and"s?
Done.
Cite #3: You've got the publisher in the author section.
It was actually written by an organization, not an individual person, as is the case with a lot of those kinds of documents.
Other cites - you see to be missing publisher details on a few. You've got the author and the title, but no publisher.
Done.
I think that's everything. Placing on hold for seven days.
Miyagawa (
talk) 21:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)reply
@
Miyagawa: That should be everything now. --Jakob (
talk) aka Jakec 18:05, 18 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Great, happy to promote to GA on that basis.
Miyagawa (
talk) 19:00, 18 August 2016 (UTC)reply