Road Rash II has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 15, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Road Rash II appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 17 June 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Indrian ( talk · contribs) 22:04, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
I suppose it only makes sense to come back for the sequel. Substantive comments to follow soon.
Indrian (
talk) 22:04, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Sorry for the wait; I took this on and then the world went haywire. Lets get this done!
Overall, this article is quite good. Once a couple of turns of phrase are tweaked and a couple of gameplay elements are clarified, it will be ready for promotion. I will go ahead and place the nomination On hold while these minor concerns are addressed. Once again, I appreciate your patience. Indrian ( talk) 08:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
The Squirrel Conspiracy (
talk) 07:27, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Cat's Tuxedo ( talk). Self-nominated at 03:32, 15 May 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Sainsf ( t · c) 17:20, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Road Rash II has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 15, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Road Rash II appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 17 June 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Indrian ( talk · contribs) 22:04, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
I suppose it only makes sense to come back for the sequel. Substantive comments to follow soon.
Indrian (
talk) 22:04, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Sorry for the wait; I took this on and then the world went haywire. Lets get this done!
Overall, this article is quite good. Once a couple of turns of phrase are tweaked and a couple of gameplay elements are clarified, it will be ready for promotion. I will go ahead and place the nomination On hold while these minor concerns are addressed. Once again, I appreciate your patience. Indrian ( talk) 08:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
The Squirrel Conspiracy (
talk) 07:27, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Cat's Tuxedo ( talk). Self-nominated at 03:32, 15 May 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Sainsf ( t · c) 17:20, 16 May 2020 (UTC)