This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
A fact from Rhyothemis fuliginosa appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 November 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Rhyothemis fuliginosa(example pictured) is known as the "butterfly dragonfly"?
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[Iridescence#Arthropods and molluscs|iridescent]] The anchor (#Arthropods and molluscs) is no longer available because it was
deleted by a user before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: My very first DYK, please feel free to give as much feedback as you can, I'm a bit overwhelmed by the process but I'll gradually get into the swing of things.
Comment Hi there,
Ornithoptera, welcome to DYK! I'm sure a reviewer will be along in a bit—in the meantime, I wanted to leave a quick (okay, it's not quick, i'm a tad wordy) comment about hooks. If you ever look through the
archive of past DYK hooks, you'll notice that a lot of them don't tell the whole story, and that's on purpose. If you leave off a bit of information, make a bit of mystery, people will want to click on your article and learn more! And you've got quite the pretty picture there, too, which'll make people want to click more if the hook runs with the image. Also, for your first five nominations, you don't have to provide a reviewed article as a QPQ—although given that we've always got a backlog around here, it is helpful :) If you ever have any questions about DYK, or if you feel stuck, feel free to ping me or leave a message on my talk page—and there are lots of other editors around to help too! Hope you share more of the things you write!
theleekycauldron (
talk •
contribs) (
they/them)
06:07, 21 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Thank you so much for your warm welcome
theleekycauldron! I have a lot to learn but I definitely appreciate the feedback you've given so far, I'll be sure to reach out if I have any more questions! Thank you for the offer and I hope to contribute more to DYK!
Ornithoptera (
talk)
06:00, 28 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Article new enough and long enough. Article is neutral in tone, and does not seem to have any policy issues. Hook is cited and paywalled/non-English sources taken AGF. Alt2 is the most "hooky" but all are good. I note that the first paragraph of the etymology section needs citation
Ornithoptera.--
Kevmin§23:19, 27 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Thank you for your feedback
Kevmin! In all honesty I was struggling to find a source on the first paragraph and was extrapolating based on what I knew prior regarding the etymology (Which is probably not the best approach). Thankfully I dug something out specifically laying out the etymology of the name Rhyothemis and threw it in there just now! Thank you again!
Ornithoptera (
talk)
06:00, 28 October 2021 (UTC)reply
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
A fact from Rhyothemis fuliginosa appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 November 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Rhyothemis fuliginosa(example pictured) is known as the "butterfly dragonfly"?
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[Iridescence#Arthropods and molluscs|iridescent]] The anchor (#Arthropods and molluscs) is no longer available because it was
deleted by a user before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: My very first DYK, please feel free to give as much feedback as you can, I'm a bit overwhelmed by the process but I'll gradually get into the swing of things.
Comment Hi there,
Ornithoptera, welcome to DYK! I'm sure a reviewer will be along in a bit—in the meantime, I wanted to leave a quick (okay, it's not quick, i'm a tad wordy) comment about hooks. If you ever look through the
archive of past DYK hooks, you'll notice that a lot of them don't tell the whole story, and that's on purpose. If you leave off a bit of information, make a bit of mystery, people will want to click on your article and learn more! And you've got quite the pretty picture there, too, which'll make people want to click more if the hook runs with the image. Also, for your first five nominations, you don't have to provide a reviewed article as a QPQ—although given that we've always got a backlog around here, it is helpful :) If you ever have any questions about DYK, or if you feel stuck, feel free to ping me or leave a message on my talk page—and there are lots of other editors around to help too! Hope you share more of the things you write!
theleekycauldron (
talk •
contribs) (
they/them)
06:07, 21 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Thank you so much for your warm welcome
theleekycauldron! I have a lot to learn but I definitely appreciate the feedback you've given so far, I'll be sure to reach out if I have any more questions! Thank you for the offer and I hope to contribute more to DYK!
Ornithoptera (
talk)
06:00, 28 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Article new enough and long enough. Article is neutral in tone, and does not seem to have any policy issues. Hook is cited and paywalled/non-English sources taken AGF. Alt2 is the most "hooky" but all are good. I note that the first paragraph of the etymology section needs citation
Ornithoptera.--
Kevmin§23:19, 27 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Thank you for your feedback
Kevmin! In all honesty I was struggling to find a source on the first paragraph and was extrapolating based on what I knew prior regarding the etymology (Which is probably not the best approach). Thankfully I dug something out specifically laying out the etymology of the name Rhyothemis and threw it in there just now! Thank you again!
Ornithoptera (
talk)
06:00, 28 October 2021 (UTC)reply