A fact from Revival Vintage Bottle Shop appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 September 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I have no clue where this should be categorized.
Valereee (
talk) 21:51, 2 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk) 13:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)reply
... that when Kentuckians discover unwanted bourbon, there's something they can do with it? Source: "Gregory says the KDA receives regular calls from state residents asking what they can do with unopened bourbon cases they discovered while cleaning out a relative’s attic or basement."
[1]
I believe that @
Valereee: has asked for a new reviewer because I worked on the hooks. --
evrik(
talk) 00:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Much of this article is devoted to the unique regulatory arrangement responsible for the store's existence. Some sources are very thin on details regarding the shop, providing only surface-level details. Some of the sources also come across as regular and unsustained news coverage, leading me to wonder if the subject meets the notability standards. Another source had to be removed per
WP:FORBESCON. I think the article requires a rework that demonstrates it meets the notability requirements with
WP:NOTNEWS in mind. ~
Pbritti (
talk) 17:13, 15 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the ping,
Evrik, looks like the notification from
Pbritti was malformed on my talk. I'm out of town, will be back Monday, will try to take a look then.
Valereee (
talk) 01:56, 16 July 2023 (UTC)reply
So, for me, what got it over the hump (I'd held off for a couple years waiting for sources) was the NYT, Tasting Table and Honolulu Star pieces. The Honolulu Star and Tasting Table are a bit short, but the NYT is definitely sigcove. The rest are local but sigcov. What was your concern,
Pbritti?
I think the article could do with a bit more expansions specifically on the shop, but that's not a matter for DYK. Got access to the NYT source and I agree that it provides SIGCOV that, when coupled with coverage in Vinepair, more than amounts to greater than local-interest news coverage. I prefer hook ALT0. Might end up making an article on the relevant legislation; it's very interesting. ~
Pbritti (
talk) 16:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Pbritti, thanks for the review! I agree on the law, I'm actually surprised we don't have an article, it's definitely received sigcov in RS.
Valereee (
talk) 16:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Note to promoter: September 1st is the start of National Bourbon Month in the US, would love to have this scheduled for then!
Valereee (
talk) 16:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)reply
I moved it to the SOHA. --
evrik(
talk) 21:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Note to promoter: It's possible this very short article (lacking an explanation of why dusties are illegal at all given the minimal possibility of contamination issues) does not meet length requirement since parts were apparently copied wholesale from
Vintage spirits. —
LlywelynII 15:19, 20 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Promotion was undone because we went from one set per day to two, and the special occasion date won't be available in prep for a few days.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 14:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)reply
I did check the articles mentioned by
LlywelynII, and this article was created and moved to mainspace the day before
Vintage spirits was created, so there isn't an issue with the length requirement. Had
Vintage spirits been nominated, it would have had to do a 5x expansion on everything copied from this article, but it wasn't.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 01:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Weird favor
Weird favor: If there's anything in this shop that accurately represents "Robertson County-style Tennessee whiskey" a photo of a bottle would be a benefit to
Andrew Johnson alcoholism debate. TY!
jengod (
talk) 20:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)reply
I'll see if I can't get down to the store and ask the proprietor about it!
Valereee (
talk) 12:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)reply
A fact from Revival Vintage Bottle Shop appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 September 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I have no clue where this should be categorized.
Valereee (
talk) 21:51, 2 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk) 13:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)reply
... that when Kentuckians discover unwanted bourbon, there's something they can do with it? Source: "Gregory says the KDA receives regular calls from state residents asking what they can do with unopened bourbon cases they discovered while cleaning out a relative’s attic or basement."
[1]
I believe that @
Valereee: has asked for a new reviewer because I worked on the hooks. --
evrik(
talk) 00:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Much of this article is devoted to the unique regulatory arrangement responsible for the store's existence. Some sources are very thin on details regarding the shop, providing only surface-level details. Some of the sources also come across as regular and unsustained news coverage, leading me to wonder if the subject meets the notability standards. Another source had to be removed per
WP:FORBESCON. I think the article requires a rework that demonstrates it meets the notability requirements with
WP:NOTNEWS in mind. ~
Pbritti (
talk) 17:13, 15 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the ping,
Evrik, looks like the notification from
Pbritti was malformed on my talk. I'm out of town, will be back Monday, will try to take a look then.
Valereee (
talk) 01:56, 16 July 2023 (UTC)reply
So, for me, what got it over the hump (I'd held off for a couple years waiting for sources) was the NYT, Tasting Table and Honolulu Star pieces. The Honolulu Star and Tasting Table are a bit short, but the NYT is definitely sigcove. The rest are local but sigcov. What was your concern,
Pbritti?
I think the article could do with a bit more expansions specifically on the shop, but that's not a matter for DYK. Got access to the NYT source and I agree that it provides SIGCOV that, when coupled with coverage in Vinepair, more than amounts to greater than local-interest news coverage. I prefer hook ALT0. Might end up making an article on the relevant legislation; it's very interesting. ~
Pbritti (
talk) 16:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Pbritti, thanks for the review! I agree on the law, I'm actually surprised we don't have an article, it's definitely received sigcov in RS.
Valereee (
talk) 16:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Note to promoter: September 1st is the start of National Bourbon Month in the US, would love to have this scheduled for then!
Valereee (
talk) 16:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)reply
I moved it to the SOHA. --
evrik(
talk) 21:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Note to promoter: It's possible this very short article (lacking an explanation of why dusties are illegal at all given the minimal possibility of contamination issues) does not meet length requirement since parts were apparently copied wholesale from
Vintage spirits. —
LlywelynII 15:19, 20 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Promotion was undone because we went from one set per day to two, and the special occasion date won't be available in prep for a few days.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 14:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)reply
I did check the articles mentioned by
LlywelynII, and this article was created and moved to mainspace the day before
Vintage spirits was created, so there isn't an issue with the length requirement. Had
Vintage spirits been nominated, it would have had to do a 5x expansion on everything copied from this article, but it wasn't.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 01:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Weird favor
Weird favor: If there's anything in this shop that accurately represents "Robertson County-style Tennessee whiskey" a photo of a bottle would be a benefit to
Andrew Johnson alcoholism debate. TY!
jengod (
talk) 20:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)reply
I'll see if I can't get down to the store and ask the proprietor about it!
Valereee (
talk) 12:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)reply