Daily page views
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is fairly accurate as far as it goes but lacks citations. I propose to expand it to bring in the following - as well as references:
The title of the article should be plural - there are 13 of them.
Grateful for any thoughts before I get started on this rough outline Julian Brazier ( talk) 15:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Dormskirk Reverting from the other article, I propose that the title of this page be made plural. From the beginning, the county associations were set up - one for each county. Ditto regional TAVRAs and now RFCAs. The current singular title gives the impression that there is a body called the 'Reserve Forces and Cadets Association'. We could make the current heading work by starting 'A Reserve Forces and Cadets Association is....', as you hint, but that reads a bit oddly to me, in this context. They were set up together...
On separate points, I think you have done all the heavy lifting on the links so far - many thanks - I will try to pick them up in the future. I will tidy the large cut and paste job under 'Role' (Should incidentally be 'Roles', I suggest), so it looks more Wikipedia-like. On gaps in citation, so far, I can only see one, which I will do now - unless you want me to provide section numbers for the provisions of the (published) Acts of Parliament? Best wishes Julian Brazier ( talk) 11:06, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Dormskirk I am sorry to be constantly asking for help but I have taken some trouble to try to put in citations dealing with BAREURLs as you suggested and seem to have hit a new problem - the footnotes overlap in an unsightly way (although they still seem to all work). Is there a way of fixing that? Julian Brazier ( talk) 10:33, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Daily page views
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is fairly accurate as far as it goes but lacks citations. I propose to expand it to bring in the following - as well as references:
The title of the article should be plural - there are 13 of them.
Grateful for any thoughts before I get started on this rough outline Julian Brazier ( talk) 15:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Dormskirk Reverting from the other article, I propose that the title of this page be made plural. From the beginning, the county associations were set up - one for each county. Ditto regional TAVRAs and now RFCAs. The current singular title gives the impression that there is a body called the 'Reserve Forces and Cadets Association'. We could make the current heading work by starting 'A Reserve Forces and Cadets Association is....', as you hint, but that reads a bit oddly to me, in this context. They were set up together...
On separate points, I think you have done all the heavy lifting on the links so far - many thanks - I will try to pick them up in the future. I will tidy the large cut and paste job under 'Role' (Should incidentally be 'Roles', I suggest), so it looks more Wikipedia-like. On gaps in citation, so far, I can only see one, which I will do now - unless you want me to provide section numbers for the provisions of the (published) Acts of Parliament? Best wishes Julian Brazier ( talk) 11:06, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Dormskirk I am sorry to be constantly asking for help but I have taken some trouble to try to put in citations dealing with BAREURLs as you suggested and seem to have hit a new problem - the footnotes overlap in an unsightly way (although they still seem to all work). Is there a way of fixing that? Julian Brazier ( talk) 10:33, 29 April 2021 (UTC)