This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Reputation (album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Reputation (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
Reputation (album) is part of the Taylor Swift original studio albums series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 11 December 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Reputation (Taylor Swift album) to Reputation (album). The result of the discussion was moved. |
On 12 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Reputation (Taylor Swift album). The result of the discussion was not moved. |
This
edit request to
Reputation (Taylor Swift album) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"Gorgeous" should be re-added as a single rather than a promotional single. It was officially sent to UK radios and charted for over three months in that area. If "The Last Time" from Red and "the 1" from folklore (other exclusively European singles) are counted as real singles, then it would be inconsistent to say that "Gorgeous" isn't one. 2601:180:8200:63D0:68BC:FDF:9A0F:6B81 ( talk) 04:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Danski454 ( talk) 00:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Reputation (Taylor Swift album) → Reputation (album) – This album is much more known than than the album by Dusty Springfield 2603:9000:CA02:CACC:6D95:2C65:CE6F:6A9B ( talk) 21:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. Per consensus. Whilst (album) is an incomplete dab, pageview and clickstream data analysis by TartarTorte provides the argument for the Taylor Swift album as the WP:PTOPIC. ( closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky ( talk) 02:21, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Reputation (album) → Reputation (Taylor Swift album) – restore back in line with WP:TITLE: poorly attended move initiated by single-day editor IP 10 months ago and closed by non-admin does not inspire confidence. Reputation (Dusty Springfield album) also exists and is a substantial article. No benefit to readers in de-TaylorSwifting article. In ictu oculi ( talk) 18:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Reputation (album)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "RIAA":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
The whole description is all messed up. Page needs to be fixed. 47.212.123.199 ( talk) 19:41, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
User:Ippantekina has a habit of edit warring on small issues. So, in preparation for that:
The hatnote should direct to the only two albums that people would be looking for if not Taylor Swift's. A link to the disambiguation page would be more appropriate if there were more than only two, but there aren't. Tree Critter ( talk) 00:04, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
The hatnote you added is hyper-specific and to think about it, would readers go to this article and expect to read about those two particular albums? I’d go for the less clunky option that is to keep it simple: this article is about Taylor Swift’s album, for other albums go to the disambig. Ronherry do you have any thoughts on this? (tagging because he/she seems an active editor on Swift articles lately). Ippantekina ( talk) 00:41, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Should be revisited and moved per WP:DISAMBIGUATION at some point. In ictu oculi ( talk) 12:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cherrell410 ( talk · contribs) 17:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Reputation (album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Reputation (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
Reputation (album) is part of the Taylor Swift original studio albums series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 11 December 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Reputation (Taylor Swift album) to Reputation (album). The result of the discussion was moved. |
On 12 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Reputation (Taylor Swift album). The result of the discussion was not moved. |
This
edit request to
Reputation (Taylor Swift album) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"Gorgeous" should be re-added as a single rather than a promotional single. It was officially sent to UK radios and charted for over three months in that area. If "The Last Time" from Red and "the 1" from folklore (other exclusively European singles) are counted as real singles, then it would be inconsistent to say that "Gorgeous" isn't one. 2601:180:8200:63D0:68BC:FDF:9A0F:6B81 ( talk) 04:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Danski454 ( talk) 00:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Reputation (Taylor Swift album) → Reputation (album) – This album is much more known than than the album by Dusty Springfield 2603:9000:CA02:CACC:6D95:2C65:CE6F:6A9B ( talk) 21:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. Per consensus. Whilst (album) is an incomplete dab, pageview and clickstream data analysis by TartarTorte provides the argument for the Taylor Swift album as the WP:PTOPIC. ( closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky ( talk) 02:21, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Reputation (album) → Reputation (Taylor Swift album) – restore back in line with WP:TITLE: poorly attended move initiated by single-day editor IP 10 months ago and closed by non-admin does not inspire confidence. Reputation (Dusty Springfield album) also exists and is a substantial article. No benefit to readers in de-TaylorSwifting article. In ictu oculi ( talk) 18:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Reputation (album)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "RIAA":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
The whole description is all messed up. Page needs to be fixed. 47.212.123.199 ( talk) 19:41, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
User:Ippantekina has a habit of edit warring on small issues. So, in preparation for that:
The hatnote should direct to the only two albums that people would be looking for if not Taylor Swift's. A link to the disambiguation page would be more appropriate if there were more than only two, but there aren't. Tree Critter ( talk) 00:04, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
The hatnote you added is hyper-specific and to think about it, would readers go to this article and expect to read about those two particular albums? I’d go for the less clunky option that is to keep it simple: this article is about Taylor Swift’s album, for other albums go to the disambig. Ronherry do you have any thoughts on this? (tagging because he/she seems an active editor on Swift articles lately). Ippantekina ( talk) 00:41, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Should be revisited and moved per WP:DISAMBIGUATION at some point. In ictu oculi ( talk) 12:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cherrell410 ( talk · contribs) 17:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
(Criteria marked are unassessed)