![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I'm pretty sure I heard the term "Republic of China on Taiwan" long before Lee uttered it. Do we have any evidence that he was the first to use it? Readin ( talk) 02:14, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
This page was turned into an article describing a political term on 11 July 2016. What was added has correlation with this article Four-Stage Theory of the Republic of China. A consensus needs to be have on whether this page should redirect to Taiwan after World War II (which is what this page started out as), or redirect to Taiwan, or others, or should it turn into an article about a political term.-- Thomasettaei ( talk) 05:30, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I understand that this article is about a political term, but in English, most looking for "Republic of China on Taiwan" are looking for the article of Taiwan, and not about a term and discourse. The title "Republic of China on Taiwan" itself is too broad for it to be just about a political term.
So, I think the best way to sort through this is to let the Theory of the Undetermined Status of Taiwan article that you (Matt Smith)'ve created be a guide (Having "Theory" in the title distinguishes it), and gave the Republic of China on Taiwan article a specific name that is more definitive to what it is about, such as Republic of China on Taiwan (political term), and then let the Republic of China on Taiwan redirect to Taiwan. That to me, makes the most sense.-- Thomasettaei ( talk) 03:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
This page offers two perspectives on the political naming and status of Taiwan/ROC/ROC on Taiwan but has so far ignored another legitimate stakeholder who are the indigenous peoples. It should not be necessary to prove that they have a right to their political stance, and thus this perspective should be explained alongside the other political perspectives. While the official name is clear, other names exist according to political perspective and that is what the pages describes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kawa650 ( talk • contribs) 07:48, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Your reasoning suggests you should not have the PRC's perspective as it is written because it also does not discuss the "political term" as you say the page does. The PRC perspective given on the page offers other terms, not further discussion of "the Republic of China on Taiwan". If, however, you present the PRC's perspective on the name/status/etc given to the ROC, then you must fairly represent other stakeholder's perspective on the term, namely the indigenous peoples' perspective. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kawa650 ( talk • contribs) 09:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC) Secondly, Wikipedia says this page is a stub and asks people to contribute to its expansion. Clearly, the page is about alternative names for the Republic of China but it only provides one, while the indigenous people also have an alternate name. Consider expanding the page so it offers the complete range of alternate names. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kawa650 ( talk • contribs) 10:07, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Your reasoning is deliberately obtuse. The political term "The Republic of China on Taiwan" is very obviously an unofficial name/noun used to represent a political reality and thus a discourse on the undetermined status of Taiwan/Republic of China. These are inseparable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kawa650 ( talk • contribs) 03:03, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Very well, then the page is redundant and I will suggest the page is deleted and the content is adapted and moved to /info/en/?search=Four-Stage_Theory_of_the_Republic_of_China — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kawa650 ( talk • contribs) 03:37, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I'm pretty sure I heard the term "Republic of China on Taiwan" long before Lee uttered it. Do we have any evidence that he was the first to use it? Readin ( talk) 02:14, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
This page was turned into an article describing a political term on 11 July 2016. What was added has correlation with this article Four-Stage Theory of the Republic of China. A consensus needs to be have on whether this page should redirect to Taiwan after World War II (which is what this page started out as), or redirect to Taiwan, or others, or should it turn into an article about a political term.-- Thomasettaei ( talk) 05:30, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I understand that this article is about a political term, but in English, most looking for "Republic of China on Taiwan" are looking for the article of Taiwan, and not about a term and discourse. The title "Republic of China on Taiwan" itself is too broad for it to be just about a political term.
So, I think the best way to sort through this is to let the Theory of the Undetermined Status of Taiwan article that you (Matt Smith)'ve created be a guide (Having "Theory" in the title distinguishes it), and gave the Republic of China on Taiwan article a specific name that is more definitive to what it is about, such as Republic of China on Taiwan (political term), and then let the Republic of China on Taiwan redirect to Taiwan. That to me, makes the most sense.-- Thomasettaei ( talk) 03:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
This page offers two perspectives on the political naming and status of Taiwan/ROC/ROC on Taiwan but has so far ignored another legitimate stakeholder who are the indigenous peoples. It should not be necessary to prove that they have a right to their political stance, and thus this perspective should be explained alongside the other political perspectives. While the official name is clear, other names exist according to political perspective and that is what the pages describes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kawa650 ( talk • contribs) 07:48, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Your reasoning suggests you should not have the PRC's perspective as it is written because it also does not discuss the "political term" as you say the page does. The PRC perspective given on the page offers other terms, not further discussion of "the Republic of China on Taiwan". If, however, you present the PRC's perspective on the name/status/etc given to the ROC, then you must fairly represent other stakeholder's perspective on the term, namely the indigenous peoples' perspective. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kawa650 ( talk • contribs) 09:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC) Secondly, Wikipedia says this page is a stub and asks people to contribute to its expansion. Clearly, the page is about alternative names for the Republic of China but it only provides one, while the indigenous people also have an alternate name. Consider expanding the page so it offers the complete range of alternate names. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kawa650 ( talk • contribs) 10:07, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Your reasoning is deliberately obtuse. The political term "The Republic of China on Taiwan" is very obviously an unofficial name/noun used to represent a political reality and thus a discourse on the undetermined status of Taiwan/Republic of China. These are inseparable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kawa650 ( talk • contribs) 03:03, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Very well, then the page is redundant and I will suggest the page is deleted and the content is adapted and moved to /info/en/?search=Four-Stage_Theory_of_the_Republic_of_China — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kawa650 ( talk • contribs) 03:37, 25 January 2019 (UTC)