This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The CoA is too big... rather unsightly. Anyone know of a way to reduce its size? -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 22:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that some contributors remove images with referenced description without prior discussion on talk page. This dangerous and illegitimate practice leads us to edit warring and should not be used on Wikipedia. I repeat, please use talk page if you are disputing something. Edit summary is simply not enough for dispute resolution.
So, if someone thinks that this image is not appropriate, let's discuss it here.-- Mladifilozof ( talk) 03:10, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
References
I have created a redirect to the Bosnia and Herzegovina article. Per the quote IP 85.228.240.231 has brought up: "The Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the official name of which shall henceforth be "Bosnia and Herzegovina," shall continue its legal existence under international law as a state, with its internal structure modified as provided herein and with its present internationally recognized borders. It shall remain a Member State of the United Nations and may as Bosnia and Herzegovina maintain or apply for membership in organizations within the United Nations system and other international organizations. " [1] -- ◅PRODUCER ( TALK) 15:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
RBiH stoped to exist with formation of Washington Agreement in 1994, and Federation and Repbulika Srpska agreed on Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1995. FBiH and RS signed Dayton and Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina where it's stated "RBiH is fron now on BiH". How is possible that RBiH existed all the way to '98? Flag was changed in 1998 alright, but it was different state with same flag and anthem and all. --
Wusten
fuchs
15:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
"Ustav je najviši pravni akt, garancija demokratije. Ustav BiH je potpisan, nije usvojen, on je dio Općeg okvirnog sporazuma za mir u BiH koji sadrţi 11 anexa (Dayton-ski sporazum). Anex IV ovog Sporazuma je ustav BiH. Ustav BiH je parafiran 21.11.1995 u Daytonu, SAD, a potpisan u Parizu, 14.12. 1995. godine. On predstavlja decentarlizirani model načina na koji bi se trebala organizirati drţava. Zasniva se na principu podjele vlasti."
From "Ustavni sistem i organizacija pravosuđa" (Senjak, Kata; Mutapčić, Džemaludin) Dayton was in force after signing. -- Wusten fuchs 18:10, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
"Republika Bosna i Hercegovina, čije je zvanično ime od sada "Bosna i Hercegovina", nastavlja svoje pravno postojanje po međunarodnom pravu kao država, sa unutrašnjom strukturom modificiranom ovim Ustavom, i sa postojećim međunarodno priznatim granicama. Ona ostaje država članica Ujedinjenih naroda i može kao Bosna i Hercegovina zadržati članstvo ili zatražiti prijem u organizacijama unutar sistema Ujedinjenih naroda, kao i u drugim međunarodnim organizacijama."
To make a summary, Bosnia and Herzegovina is the same country as the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. We made a big mistake by creating a separate article. The reason for this is because Bosnia and Herzegovina remained member of the UN without any new procedure after 1995. The only change was removal of the "Republic" from its name. I propose we merge this article and would like to see other oppinions. -- Wüstenfuchs 13:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
I am proposing to merge this article into Bosnia and Herzegovina. Will anyone be opposing and why? Personally I dont understand this article, is this article suposed to indicate that Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina is some different country than Bosnia and Herzegovina? If so, corrections at Bosnia and Herzegovina should be made, or otherwise this article has no reason to exist as separate, cause from what I see Bosnia and Herzegovina is the article that refers to the country that exists since 1992 and includes the entire period from 1992 till nowadays. One particular editor is replacing Bosnia and Herzegovina by this article as country of birth at infoboxes, I asked him to express his reasons here. FkpCascais ( talk) 20:08, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
The map in the infobox should not depict entire Bosnia and Herzegovina since Republika Srpska was never part of the "Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina". Its territory should be excluded (not sure if Herceg-Bosnia as well). FkpCascais ( talk) 17:21, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
188.172.108.205 ( talk) 13:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Does RBiH have a Legislative body? because if it's a parliamentary republic, it should have a legislature, so the parliament can exercise the government. Mhatopzz ( talk) 11:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina is a same state as Bosnia and Herzegovina with modified name and internal structure. Annex 4, Article 1 of the Dayton Peace Agreement states that Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina continues its legal existance under a new name. Change in name or constitution does not negate the statehood. If that were the case each time any country that changes a flag or had an amendment to a consititution it would cancel its previous statehood and would be considered a new state. It is bizzare to see a similar attempt made here, but not surprising as it falls under a seen political doctrine of negating RBiH statehood DadoNYC ( talk) 16:49, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
It is the direct legal predecessor to the modern-day state of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The CoA is too big... rather unsightly. Anyone know of a way to reduce its size? -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 22:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that some contributors remove images with referenced description without prior discussion on talk page. This dangerous and illegitimate practice leads us to edit warring and should not be used on Wikipedia. I repeat, please use talk page if you are disputing something. Edit summary is simply not enough for dispute resolution.
So, if someone thinks that this image is not appropriate, let's discuss it here.-- Mladifilozof ( talk) 03:10, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
References
I have created a redirect to the Bosnia and Herzegovina article. Per the quote IP 85.228.240.231 has brought up: "The Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the official name of which shall henceforth be "Bosnia and Herzegovina," shall continue its legal existence under international law as a state, with its internal structure modified as provided herein and with its present internationally recognized borders. It shall remain a Member State of the United Nations and may as Bosnia and Herzegovina maintain or apply for membership in organizations within the United Nations system and other international organizations. " [1] -- ◅PRODUCER ( TALK) 15:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
RBiH stoped to exist with formation of Washington Agreement in 1994, and Federation and Repbulika Srpska agreed on Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1995. FBiH and RS signed Dayton and Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina where it's stated "RBiH is fron now on BiH". How is possible that RBiH existed all the way to '98? Flag was changed in 1998 alright, but it was different state with same flag and anthem and all. --
Wusten
fuchs
15:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
"Ustav je najviši pravni akt, garancija demokratije. Ustav BiH je potpisan, nije usvojen, on je dio Općeg okvirnog sporazuma za mir u BiH koji sadrţi 11 anexa (Dayton-ski sporazum). Anex IV ovog Sporazuma je ustav BiH. Ustav BiH je parafiran 21.11.1995 u Daytonu, SAD, a potpisan u Parizu, 14.12. 1995. godine. On predstavlja decentarlizirani model načina na koji bi se trebala organizirati drţava. Zasniva se na principu podjele vlasti."
From "Ustavni sistem i organizacija pravosuđa" (Senjak, Kata; Mutapčić, Džemaludin) Dayton was in force after signing. -- Wusten fuchs 18:10, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
"Republika Bosna i Hercegovina, čije je zvanično ime od sada "Bosna i Hercegovina", nastavlja svoje pravno postojanje po međunarodnom pravu kao država, sa unutrašnjom strukturom modificiranom ovim Ustavom, i sa postojećim međunarodno priznatim granicama. Ona ostaje država članica Ujedinjenih naroda i može kao Bosna i Hercegovina zadržati članstvo ili zatražiti prijem u organizacijama unutar sistema Ujedinjenih naroda, kao i u drugim međunarodnim organizacijama."
To make a summary, Bosnia and Herzegovina is the same country as the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. We made a big mistake by creating a separate article. The reason for this is because Bosnia and Herzegovina remained member of the UN without any new procedure after 1995. The only change was removal of the "Republic" from its name. I propose we merge this article and would like to see other oppinions. -- Wüstenfuchs 13:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
I am proposing to merge this article into Bosnia and Herzegovina. Will anyone be opposing and why? Personally I dont understand this article, is this article suposed to indicate that Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina is some different country than Bosnia and Herzegovina? If so, corrections at Bosnia and Herzegovina should be made, or otherwise this article has no reason to exist as separate, cause from what I see Bosnia and Herzegovina is the article that refers to the country that exists since 1992 and includes the entire period from 1992 till nowadays. One particular editor is replacing Bosnia and Herzegovina by this article as country of birth at infoboxes, I asked him to express his reasons here. FkpCascais ( talk) 20:08, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
The map in the infobox should not depict entire Bosnia and Herzegovina since Republika Srpska was never part of the "Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina". Its territory should be excluded (not sure if Herceg-Bosnia as well). FkpCascais ( talk) 17:21, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
188.172.108.205 ( talk) 13:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Does RBiH have a Legislative body? because if it's a parliamentary republic, it should have a legislature, so the parliament can exercise the government. Mhatopzz ( talk) 11:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina is a same state as Bosnia and Herzegovina with modified name and internal structure. Annex 4, Article 1 of the Dayton Peace Agreement states that Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina continues its legal existance under a new name. Change in name or constitution does not negate the statehood. If that were the case each time any country that changes a flag or had an amendment to a consititution it would cancel its previous statehood and would be considered a new state. It is bizzare to see a similar attempt made here, but not surprising as it falls under a seen political doctrine of negating RBiH statehood DadoNYC ( talk) 16:49, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
It is the direct legal predecessor to the modern-day state of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC)