This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Report about Case Srebrenica article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Report about Case Srebrenica. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Report about Case Srebrenica at the Reference desk. |
![]() | Report about Case Srebrenica has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Well done, ChrisO. I think this was a perfect way to separate the negativity of this report from the negativity of its author such that both subjects can be treated NPOV within Wikipedia without undue weight issues. — X S G 17:56, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Editors should be aware that the anonymous IP and the new user account Arthur999 ( talk · contribs) that have been vandalising this article are both almost certainly sockpuppets of the banned Darko Trifunovic ( talk · contribs). Banned users are not allowed to edit or contribute, even on talk pages, so please do not engage with this individual - just report it to an admin. -- ChrisO ( talk) 08:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
The article has recently been repeatedly vandalised by an IP editor to alter the spelling of "Darko Trifunović". This is, needless to say, Trifunović sockpuppeting again - apparently he is seeking to vandalise the spelling of his own name so that the article does not appear if you Google for his name. Please revert on sight. -- ChrisO ( talk) 07:57, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Wustenfuchs ( talk · contribs) 17:25, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
You should add the pages in few citations mentioned above, find links for every citation from the news (mentioned above). Also name the authors wherever possible and add date of retrieving.
-- Wusten fuchs 18:13, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Ok, everything is fine now. I'm going to promote this article. -- Wusten fuchs 20:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Report about Case Srebrenica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:53, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Report about Case Srebrenica article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Report about Case Srebrenica. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Report about Case Srebrenica at the Reference desk. |
![]() | Report about Case Srebrenica has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Well done, ChrisO. I think this was a perfect way to separate the negativity of this report from the negativity of its author such that both subjects can be treated NPOV within Wikipedia without undue weight issues. — X S G 17:56, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Editors should be aware that the anonymous IP and the new user account Arthur999 ( talk · contribs) that have been vandalising this article are both almost certainly sockpuppets of the banned Darko Trifunovic ( talk · contribs). Banned users are not allowed to edit or contribute, even on talk pages, so please do not engage with this individual - just report it to an admin. -- ChrisO ( talk) 08:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
The article has recently been repeatedly vandalised by an IP editor to alter the spelling of "Darko Trifunović". This is, needless to say, Trifunović sockpuppeting again - apparently he is seeking to vandalise the spelling of his own name so that the article does not appear if you Google for his name. Please revert on sight. -- ChrisO ( talk) 07:57, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Wustenfuchs ( talk · contribs) 17:25, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
You should add the pages in few citations mentioned above, find links for every citation from the news (mentioned above). Also name the authors wherever possible and add date of retrieving.
-- Wusten fuchs 18:13, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Ok, everything is fine now. I'm going to promote this article. -- Wusten fuchs 20:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Report about Case Srebrenica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:53, 31 March 2016 (UTC)