![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Give me a break I only created it yesterday and most of it is from our memories of things that happened 25 years ago. How can be be an advert you cant buy it anymore. Dont you want Wiki to be the font of all knowledge? It is the history of a significant piece of software. Instead of just posting stuff how about editing it into Wiki wys like you suggest. Deben Dave ( talk) 13:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
I really can’t understand your objection to this article. All I am trying to do is to tell the world about a significant piece of software and what it did. If my writing skills are not up to the wiki standards then why don’t you help me? Deben Dave ( talk) 13:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
The source is the man who actually designed the software in the first place as detailed in the Acknowledgements. You cannot get a better source than that can you? IMHO it is not written like an advert and is similar to lots of other wiki pages. Can we get another independent opinion? Deben Dave ( talk) 21:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
I am afraid I don’t know any published source about Registrar apart from the user manuals and that is why I am putting it on WIKI. There were thousands of users who I am sure could verify what I am saying and hopefully they will see this. Can you suggest any other way on confirming notability? Deben Dave ( talk) 16:49, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Well I am trying really hard how am I doing? If you decide to delete the article let me know and then I will delete it myself but I hope it does not come to that. This program changed the lives of thousands of people and I think needs to be recorded. Deben Dave ( talk) 19:14, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
I'm personally pretty sure this is historically notable. Despite the original editor's claim of there being no sources but manual, there seem to be quite a few references online which can be found using Google. This book on Google Books for example verifies the number of installations and that it was one of the leading products of its type for the time. Yworo ( talk) 13:51, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Of course, whether Wikipedia needs this much detail on an obsolete software product and whether the available sources support such a long article is another matter entirely. Yworo ( talk) 14:04, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Give me a break I only created it yesterday and most of it is from our memories of things that happened 25 years ago. How can be be an advert you cant buy it anymore. Dont you want Wiki to be the font of all knowledge? It is the history of a significant piece of software. Instead of just posting stuff how about editing it into Wiki wys like you suggest. Deben Dave ( talk) 13:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
I really can’t understand your objection to this article. All I am trying to do is to tell the world about a significant piece of software and what it did. If my writing skills are not up to the wiki standards then why don’t you help me? Deben Dave ( talk) 13:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
The source is the man who actually designed the software in the first place as detailed in the Acknowledgements. You cannot get a better source than that can you? IMHO it is not written like an advert and is similar to lots of other wiki pages. Can we get another independent opinion? Deben Dave ( talk) 21:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
I am afraid I don’t know any published source about Registrar apart from the user manuals and that is why I am putting it on WIKI. There were thousands of users who I am sure could verify what I am saying and hopefully they will see this. Can you suggest any other way on confirming notability? Deben Dave ( talk) 16:49, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Well I am trying really hard how am I doing? If you decide to delete the article let me know and then I will delete it myself but I hope it does not come to that. This program changed the lives of thousands of people and I think needs to be recorded. Deben Dave ( talk) 19:14, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
I'm personally pretty sure this is historically notable. Despite the original editor's claim of there being no sources but manual, there seem to be quite a few references online which can be found using Google. This book on Google Books for example verifies the number of installations and that it was one of the leading products of its type for the time. Yworo ( talk) 13:51, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Of course, whether Wikipedia needs this much detail on an obsolete software product and whether the available sources support such a long article is another matter entirely. Yworo ( talk) 14:04, 24 July 2009 (UTC)