![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=176085 says that Gallus gallus is junglefowl while Gallus gallus gallus is red junglefowl —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.78.79.114 ( talk) 15:27, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
In the chart of "Types of Poultry" for chickens in the poultry article, the "Domestication" columns states that chickens were domesticated in China in 3000 BC. However, this article states that chickens were domesticated from the Red Junglefowl in India. So which is it? These two articles appear to conflict.
Snazzattack ( talk) 21:49, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Photo needed!! Shandris the azylean 19:54, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Hey so does this mean the chicken came first or the egg? # BROWN SAY SOMETHING!!! | 01:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
why is the Jungle Fowl listed as least concern when there is a documented section about them facing extinction due to genetic contamination? One or the other needs to change- I am in favor of changing the status to something closer to the extinction end of the spectrum. Wcbpolish ( talk) 18:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
There appears that there might be a problem with the dates in the domestication section. First we are told that domestication occurred at least 5400 years ago (about 3400BC) then we are given a date for the 'earliest undisputed dometic chicken remains' of 5400BC (about 7400 BP). I followed the citation given, and that article also contains this discrepancy. It seems likely that it is a typo given the other information in the article and the fact the same number (5400) is given twice. The source gives a citation for the 5400BC date, but I am unable to find that online. The source is: Journal of World Prehistory June 1997, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 103-160: Current issues in Chinese Neolithic archaeology, Anne P. Underhill
Perhaps some one with better resources could follow this up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.240.207.146 ( talk) 21:48, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
1. In the section on sexual dimorphism, the first line says that both males and females have combs, but the last line of the first paragraph of the section says that females lack the comb.
2. The Conservation-status side bar at the right side of the page says the jungle fowl is of "Least concern," but the last line of the article says the jungle fowl in its pure form is threatened with extinction because of hybridization with domestic birds. Perhaps there should be a clarification about survival of the wild-type form vs. that of the species as a whole, which is largely comprised of domestic varieties.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmmeiss ( talk • contribs) 18:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Red Jungle Fowl can find in Nepal also. But there are no any article until now about this. -- 58.147.132.230 ( talk) 06:46, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I can't find any reference to the max of 18 eggs per year, or any citation of number of eggs per chicken in the source 28 : {Citation/title=Breeding ecology of red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) in Deva Vatala National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan ( retrieved 8 October 2020 )|url= https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316846785_Breeding_ecology_of_red_jungle_fowl_Gallus_gallus_in_Deva_Vatala_National_Park_Azad_Jammu_and_Kashmir_Pakistan}
Turbelette ( talk) 20:45, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Gallus_distribution.jpg is ridiculous! Chickens are even more colocated with humans than rats. 141.239.252.245 ( talk) 02:54, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=176085 says that Gallus gallus is junglefowl while Gallus gallus gallus is red junglefowl —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.78.79.114 ( talk) 15:27, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
In the chart of "Types of Poultry" for chickens in the poultry article, the "Domestication" columns states that chickens were domesticated in China in 3000 BC. However, this article states that chickens were domesticated from the Red Junglefowl in India. So which is it? These two articles appear to conflict.
Snazzattack ( talk) 21:49, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Photo needed!! Shandris the azylean 19:54, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Hey so does this mean the chicken came first or the egg? # BROWN SAY SOMETHING!!! | 01:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
why is the Jungle Fowl listed as least concern when there is a documented section about them facing extinction due to genetic contamination? One or the other needs to change- I am in favor of changing the status to something closer to the extinction end of the spectrum. Wcbpolish ( talk) 18:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
There appears that there might be a problem with the dates in the domestication section. First we are told that domestication occurred at least 5400 years ago (about 3400BC) then we are given a date for the 'earliest undisputed dometic chicken remains' of 5400BC (about 7400 BP). I followed the citation given, and that article also contains this discrepancy. It seems likely that it is a typo given the other information in the article and the fact the same number (5400) is given twice. The source gives a citation for the 5400BC date, but I am unable to find that online. The source is: Journal of World Prehistory June 1997, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 103-160: Current issues in Chinese Neolithic archaeology, Anne P. Underhill
Perhaps some one with better resources could follow this up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.240.207.146 ( talk) 21:48, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
1. In the section on sexual dimorphism, the first line says that both males and females have combs, but the last line of the first paragraph of the section says that females lack the comb.
2. The Conservation-status side bar at the right side of the page says the jungle fowl is of "Least concern," but the last line of the article says the jungle fowl in its pure form is threatened with extinction because of hybridization with domestic birds. Perhaps there should be a clarification about survival of the wild-type form vs. that of the species as a whole, which is largely comprised of domestic varieties.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmmeiss ( talk • contribs) 18:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Red Jungle Fowl can find in Nepal also. But there are no any article until now about this. -- 58.147.132.230 ( talk) 06:46, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I can't find any reference to the max of 18 eggs per year, or any citation of number of eggs per chicken in the source 28 : {Citation/title=Breeding ecology of red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) in Deva Vatala National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan ( retrieved 8 October 2020 )|url= https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316846785_Breeding_ecology_of_red_jungle_fowl_Gallus_gallus_in_Deva_Vatala_National_Park_Azad_Jammu_and_Kashmir_Pakistan}
Turbelette ( talk) 20:45, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Gallus_distribution.jpg is ridiculous! Chickens are even more colocated with humans than rats. 141.239.252.245 ( talk) 02:54, 16 July 2024 (UTC)