This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Whoever did the cast list doesn't seem to understand Russian name conventions, which vary by gender. The main character's uncle's surname is given as "Ergorova". It should be "Ergorov". 2001:558:6011:1:9975:DAD7:61C2:1D96 ( talk) 04:12, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi!
It's Neateditor123 here, and there's something on this page I need to point out: the inclusion of what the film was rated in all these different countries.
Now while this may be important for some, what a film was rated by the MPAA does not belong on a Wikipedia page. It is simply irreverent. I see the good intentions here, but unless the film rating was changed, amended, appealed, or edited in some way, please don't include it here.
Warmest Regards, -- Neateditor123 ( talk) 16:22, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123
OK, OK, OK, I'll leave it up then. Truth be told, the only reason I did that was because I got the same response when I added the same thing to the Isle of Dogs (film) page.
Sincerely, -- Neateditor123 ( talk) 19:27, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123
OK, it looks like the film ratings have officially been deleted from this Wikipedia page, so it looks like all this chaos is over. Right?
Oh, and as a brief FYI, I added the MPAA rating back to the Isle of Dogs (film) page as it was amended from PG-13 for "thematic elements and violent images" to PG-13 for "thematic elements and some violent images". Is that OK to put on a Wikipedia page? Another good example would be The 15:17 to Paris page, where I noted that the film originally received an R rating for "a sequence of violence and bloody images", but managed to appeal to a PG-13. Are all of those examples OK to be on a Wikipedia page? Please let me know all your thoughts!
Sincerely, -- Neateditor123 ( talk) 15:15, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123
All right then. Oh, and sorry if I seemed a little harsh beforehand, or if it seemed like I was contradicting myself by first saying I deleted that section only because somebody else did the same to mine and then making the case for my statement again. It's just that I didn't really know how to react when you made your statement at first and I really wanted to keep myself out of it even if I didn't agree with what you had to say. Again, I thoroughly respect your opinions and what you are trying to do here, but even so, unless it's for some special purpose (like the examples I gave above), please try to keep film ratings off Wikipedia.
Warmest Regards Forever, -- Neateditor123 ( talk) 19:11, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123
There Exist Red Sparrow Disambiguation Page. Then There Is This Page. Only Difference Is Capitals In "Sparrow". Maybe One Of Two Pages Should Have New Name. IUpdateRottenTomatoes ( talk) 21:31, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
i suggest perhaps it is good idea to move to red sparrow (film). IUpdateRottenTomatoes ( talk) 21:30, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the fourth sentence, Dimitiry doesn't attempt to rape Dominika, he is actually raping her when he is killed. Just because he didn't finish doesn't make it less of a rape. It should be changed to something like "As Dimitiry rapes Dominika, he is killed." 97.81.103.2 ( talk) 03:08, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
I would suggest that you replace "Injury" with the word assault which occured when her dancing partner deliberately landed on her leg, breaking it. The first of many violent acts portrayed throughout the movie.The portrayal of the injury as an accident is disproved when Dominikas uncle gives her a recording of her dance partner talking with his lover (a competing dancer) saying that he thinks Dominika knows he purposely fell on her leg so that another dancer (his lover) could get the part. Which raises the question of why he would do this during a performance rather than during a rehearsal. This movie poses a lot of questions that are not easily answered. Ipedialyte ( talk) 05:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Whoever did the cast list doesn't seem to understand Russian name conventions, which vary by gender. The main character's uncle's surname is given as "Ergorova". It should be "Ergorov". 2001:558:6011:1:9975:DAD7:61C2:1D96 ( talk) 04:12, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi!
It's Neateditor123 here, and there's something on this page I need to point out: the inclusion of what the film was rated in all these different countries.
Now while this may be important for some, what a film was rated by the MPAA does not belong on a Wikipedia page. It is simply irreverent. I see the good intentions here, but unless the film rating was changed, amended, appealed, or edited in some way, please don't include it here.
Warmest Regards, -- Neateditor123 ( talk) 16:22, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123
OK, OK, OK, I'll leave it up then. Truth be told, the only reason I did that was because I got the same response when I added the same thing to the Isle of Dogs (film) page.
Sincerely, -- Neateditor123 ( talk) 19:27, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123
OK, it looks like the film ratings have officially been deleted from this Wikipedia page, so it looks like all this chaos is over. Right?
Oh, and as a brief FYI, I added the MPAA rating back to the Isle of Dogs (film) page as it was amended from PG-13 for "thematic elements and violent images" to PG-13 for "thematic elements and some violent images". Is that OK to put on a Wikipedia page? Another good example would be The 15:17 to Paris page, where I noted that the film originally received an R rating for "a sequence of violence and bloody images", but managed to appeal to a PG-13. Are all of those examples OK to be on a Wikipedia page? Please let me know all your thoughts!
Sincerely, -- Neateditor123 ( talk) 15:15, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123
All right then. Oh, and sorry if I seemed a little harsh beforehand, or if it seemed like I was contradicting myself by first saying I deleted that section only because somebody else did the same to mine and then making the case for my statement again. It's just that I didn't really know how to react when you made your statement at first and I really wanted to keep myself out of it even if I didn't agree with what you had to say. Again, I thoroughly respect your opinions and what you are trying to do here, but even so, unless it's for some special purpose (like the examples I gave above), please try to keep film ratings off Wikipedia.
Warmest Regards Forever, -- Neateditor123 ( talk) 19:11, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123
There Exist Red Sparrow Disambiguation Page. Then There Is This Page. Only Difference Is Capitals In "Sparrow". Maybe One Of Two Pages Should Have New Name. IUpdateRottenTomatoes ( talk) 21:31, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
i suggest perhaps it is good idea to move to red sparrow (film). IUpdateRottenTomatoes ( talk) 21:30, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the fourth sentence, Dimitiry doesn't attempt to rape Dominika, he is actually raping her when he is killed. Just because he didn't finish doesn't make it less of a rape. It should be changed to something like "As Dimitiry rapes Dominika, he is killed." 97.81.103.2 ( talk) 03:08, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
I would suggest that you replace "Injury" with the word assault which occured when her dancing partner deliberately landed on her leg, breaking it. The first of many violent acts portrayed throughout the movie.The portrayal of the injury as an accident is disproved when Dominikas uncle gives her a recording of her dance partner talking with his lover (a competing dancer) saying that he thinks Dominika knows he purposely fell on her leg so that another dancer (his lover) could get the part. Which raises the question of why he would do this during a performance rather than during a rehearsal. This movie poses a lot of questions that are not easily answered. Ipedialyte ( talk) 05:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)