This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Isn't it contradictory to have an article that cites the end game of chess happening because the Red King (the Red Queen's 'mate') is captured, and then also have a sentence concerning how she embodies the analogue of the RQH featuring an ability to "survive with or without her mate". Quaeler ( talk) 21:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Content of Red Queen page should be merged here, and Red Queen should become the disambiguation page. Cf. Red King, White Queen, etc. Goustien ( talk) 05:25, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
I find jarring that almost half the content is devoted to a discussion of sexual selection that entirely belongs to another article. That section doesn't just explain the reference to the Red Queen in Ridley study (actually, it doesn't even explain that), but goes on in a long digression about this other topic (especially starting from the paragraph that begins with "Sex is an evolutionary puzzle" - what does that has to do with the Red Queen?), and even going as far as ending with several "See also" that are relevant only to that topic — if one wanted to know more about it, they would go and read the specific article, not an article about the Red Queen. 37.117.60.94 ( talk) 23:09, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Red Queen (Through the Looking-Glass). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:43, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Isn't it contradictory to have an article that cites the end game of chess happening because the Red King (the Red Queen's 'mate') is captured, and then also have a sentence concerning how she embodies the analogue of the RQH featuring an ability to "survive with or without her mate". Quaeler ( talk) 21:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Content of Red Queen page should be merged here, and Red Queen should become the disambiguation page. Cf. Red King, White Queen, etc. Goustien ( talk) 05:25, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
I find jarring that almost half the content is devoted to a discussion of sexual selection that entirely belongs to another article. That section doesn't just explain the reference to the Red Queen in Ridley study (actually, it doesn't even explain that), but goes on in a long digression about this other topic (especially starting from the paragraph that begins with "Sex is an evolutionary puzzle" - what does that has to do with the Red Queen?), and even going as far as ending with several "See also" that are relevant only to that topic — if one wanted to know more about it, they would go and read the specific article, not an article about the Red Queen. 37.117.60.94 ( talk) 23:09, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Red Queen (Through the Looking-Glass). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:43, 23 February 2016 (UTC)