This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There was no reference section in this article until I added one with this edit on 27 June 2013. When I did so I chose the referencing system I personally prefer, list-defined references, and added a {{ Use list-defined references}} maintenance tag to the page. Midnightblueowl, without discussion of any kind, changed that to a different system on 22 June 2014, despite our very clear guideline at WP:CITEVAR:
Editors should not attempt to change an article's established citation style merely on the grounds of personal preference, to make it match other articles, or without first seeking consensus for the change. If the article you are editing is already using a particular citation style, you should follow it; if you believe it is inappropriate for the needs of the article, seek consensus for a change on the talk page.
I converted the references back to the established system with this edit, citing that guideline in my edit summary. Midnightblueowl has now again reverted to a different system. Perhaps that editor would care to explain why he/she thinks that WP:CITEVAR does not apply here, and why he/she is edit-warring? Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 11:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Claiming this suburban house is "one of the most important examples of nineteenth-century British architecture still extant" is both subjective and patently absurd. I visited today - it's a nice enough but rather ordinary Victorian house, somewhat ugly and spartan with almost no original decoration or furniture, only 1970s reproduction wallpaper. Of the vast array of 19th century British architecture this is a very minor and run-of-the-mill example. Gymnophoria ( talk) 21:38, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Red House, Bexleyheath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Red House (paris) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 19#Red House (paris) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 20:19, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There was no reference section in this article until I added one with this edit on 27 June 2013. When I did so I chose the referencing system I personally prefer, list-defined references, and added a {{ Use list-defined references}} maintenance tag to the page. Midnightblueowl, without discussion of any kind, changed that to a different system on 22 June 2014, despite our very clear guideline at WP:CITEVAR:
Editors should not attempt to change an article's established citation style merely on the grounds of personal preference, to make it match other articles, or without first seeking consensus for the change. If the article you are editing is already using a particular citation style, you should follow it; if you believe it is inappropriate for the needs of the article, seek consensus for a change on the talk page.
I converted the references back to the established system with this edit, citing that guideline in my edit summary. Midnightblueowl has now again reverted to a different system. Perhaps that editor would care to explain why he/she thinks that WP:CITEVAR does not apply here, and why he/she is edit-warring? Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 11:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Claiming this suburban house is "one of the most important examples of nineteenth-century British architecture still extant" is both subjective and patently absurd. I visited today - it's a nice enough but rather ordinary Victorian house, somewhat ugly and spartan with almost no original decoration or furniture, only 1970s reproduction wallpaper. Of the vast array of 19th century British architecture this is a very minor and run-of-the-mill example. Gymnophoria ( talk) 21:38, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Red House, Bexleyheath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Red House (paris) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 19#Red House (paris) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 20:19, 19 July 2022 (UTC)