This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Red Hen restaurant controversy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 June 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I am starting this topic to discuss whether information on the number of tables in the restaurant and geographic distance to Washington D.C. should be included in the entry. The number of seats in the restaurant, distance to another city, or the population of the town where the restaurant is located are not relevant to informing the reader that a controversy occurred or to what the topic of the controversy was related. The positions of the subjects of the controversy are already addressed in the article. The edit explanation provided for including the information implies that it is important to provide mitigating information to distinguish the restaurant from a major chain of restaurants. This entry is to inform about the occurrence of a controversy and not to support/defend or advocate for either side of the controversy. The focus of this article is on the subject of the controversy and not the restaurant where the controversy occurred. This extraneous information is appropriate for a separate article on the restaurant and its history but not here. PennyForYourThoughts231 ( talk) 23:22, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 16:52, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 19:51, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Sanders wasn't asked to leave just because she's a conservative or works in the Trump White House, but rather because she "publicly defended the president's cruelest policies" (probably mainly referring to separation of children from parents at the border), so the summary in the lead section could be over-simplified... AnonMoos ( talk) 16:18, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Don’t you think that it’s a bit too much WP:WEIGHT to give a political figure’s tweets alleging that Sanders broke the law without any rebuttal? Honestly I though we were supposed to avoid citing twitter drama for information pertaining to living people. And, shouldn’t it be clear that there ain’t nothing about this that’s proven in a court of law? 2600:100C:B214:BA82:DD31:D047:C055:E83 ( talk) 22:13, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Red Hen restaurant controversy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 June 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I am starting this topic to discuss whether information on the number of tables in the restaurant and geographic distance to Washington D.C. should be included in the entry. The number of seats in the restaurant, distance to another city, or the population of the town where the restaurant is located are not relevant to informing the reader that a controversy occurred or to what the topic of the controversy was related. The positions of the subjects of the controversy are already addressed in the article. The edit explanation provided for including the information implies that it is important to provide mitigating information to distinguish the restaurant from a major chain of restaurants. This entry is to inform about the occurrence of a controversy and not to support/defend or advocate for either side of the controversy. The focus of this article is on the subject of the controversy and not the restaurant where the controversy occurred. This extraneous information is appropriate for a separate article on the restaurant and its history but not here. PennyForYourThoughts231 ( talk) 23:22, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 16:52, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 19:51, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Sanders wasn't asked to leave just because she's a conservative or works in the Trump White House, but rather because she "publicly defended the president's cruelest policies" (probably mainly referring to separation of children from parents at the border), so the summary in the lead section could be over-simplified... AnonMoos ( talk) 16:18, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Don’t you think that it’s a bit too much WP:WEIGHT to give a political figure’s tweets alleging that Sanders broke the law without any rebuttal? Honestly I though we were supposed to avoid citing twitter drama for information pertaining to living people. And, shouldn’t it be clear that there ain’t nothing about this that’s proven in a court of law? 2600:100C:B214:BA82:DD31:D047:C055:E83 ( talk) 22:13, 13 October 2021 (UTC)