This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 6 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Harmoneemorgan, Qnzk, Misspaulinac. Peer reviewers: Studentnumberunknown, Jillxkettman, Jchoi209, Yuricas3541.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 03:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
1. What the article does well in is gathering a variety of reliable sources. It also has a good amount of information especially on the locations established which is very important since that's what the nonprofit does. Finally, it really tries to be neutral and to not force a singular viewpoint. I was really impressed with the amount of sentences that were neutral and had a source a the end; no changes needed.
2. However, the sentences need to reviewed. There is a lot of repetition and information is disconnected or in a wrong order. (I did some editing on the Art Bank and Dorchester paragraphs). This will really help because it will make it easier to read and help with understanding the information.
3. The most important improvements I recommend is to meet the Wikipedia requirements. In regards to the leading sentence, I was very confused because it did not preview the rest of the article and it did not weigh in the important parts of the article. This is important because a clear preview gives a clear structure of the rest of the article. For example, the locations were not mentioned at first so I did not understand how they related to the nonprofit until after I finished reading them. Another requirement is, that each sentence needs the source of which it came from and for then to be add at the end of EACH sentence. This is important because if it's not credible enough it can be removed. Finally, there needs to be a balance of content. This is successful when it comes to the locations but it is not balanced when it comes to the subheadings. Some subheadings had one sentences while others had more.
4. Overall, you have a great skeleton for the on profits wiki page and its filled with information. And by reviewing this article, it has helped me too because I also need to review my sentences structures; mine are too disconnected. And, I need more sources from different sites to avoid having a singular viewpoint. Yuricas3541 ( talk) 02:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
I added this article to /info/en/?search=Category:Arts_and_entertainment_work_group_articles_needing_attention. The Theaster Gates article appears to have the same problem. (See Talk:Theaster Gates.) Acwilson9 ( talk) 06:09, 6 January 2022 (UTC) ; Acwilson9 ( talk) 02:36, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 6 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Harmoneemorgan, Qnzk, Misspaulinac. Peer reviewers: Studentnumberunknown, Jillxkettman, Jchoi209, Yuricas3541.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 03:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
1. What the article does well in is gathering a variety of reliable sources. It also has a good amount of information especially on the locations established which is very important since that's what the nonprofit does. Finally, it really tries to be neutral and to not force a singular viewpoint. I was really impressed with the amount of sentences that were neutral and had a source a the end; no changes needed.
2. However, the sentences need to reviewed. There is a lot of repetition and information is disconnected or in a wrong order. (I did some editing on the Art Bank and Dorchester paragraphs). This will really help because it will make it easier to read and help with understanding the information.
3. The most important improvements I recommend is to meet the Wikipedia requirements. In regards to the leading sentence, I was very confused because it did not preview the rest of the article and it did not weigh in the important parts of the article. This is important because a clear preview gives a clear structure of the rest of the article. For example, the locations were not mentioned at first so I did not understand how they related to the nonprofit until after I finished reading them. Another requirement is, that each sentence needs the source of which it came from and for then to be add at the end of EACH sentence. This is important because if it's not credible enough it can be removed. Finally, there needs to be a balance of content. This is successful when it comes to the locations but it is not balanced when it comes to the subheadings. Some subheadings had one sentences while others had more.
4. Overall, you have a great skeleton for the on profits wiki page and its filled with information. And by reviewing this article, it has helped me too because I also need to review my sentences structures; mine are too disconnected. And, I need more sources from different sites to avoid having a singular viewpoint. Yuricas3541 ( talk) 02:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
I added this article to /info/en/?search=Category:Arts_and_entertainment_work_group_articles_needing_attention. The Theaster Gates article appears to have the same problem. (See Talk:Theaster Gates.) Acwilson9 ( talk) 06:09, 6 January 2022 (UTC) ; Acwilson9 ( talk) 02:36, 7 January 2022 (UTC)