![]() | Rebeca Andrade has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 6, 2022. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Rebeca Andrade is the first Brazilian female gymnast to win a medal
at the Olympic Games? |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Heard an NBC pundit make a passing mention of it. 161.185.160.74 ( talk) 21:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sportsfan77777 ( talk · contribs) 08:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
I'll review. Sportsfan77777 ( talk) 08:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
A general issue is that while you may do a good job of listing out all of her accomplishments year to year, there should be summaries in each subsection (probably at the beginning, or maybe at the end) that synthesize the results in that subsection. Without that, it is not so clear how good or bad each year was, or potentially what was the significance of the events that aren't the Olympics or Worlds, or which event she is focusing on or did the best in (if any). Along those lines, it may also be worth combining more pairs or sets of years together, as the summaries may be better suited to cover multiple years.
Beyond the summaries, a lesser similar issue is that the flow is also not always the best. It seems like most subsections are commonly strung together as "She competed at Competition 1. She won [insert color] medal in Event A and finished #th in Event B. She then entered Competition 2, and won [insert color] medal in Event B and finished #th in Event C". Improving the flow a bit might go hand-in-hand with adding the summaries.
I don't have any gymnastics examples of what I mean by summaries, but here are some tennis examples:
I'll review the article section-by-section after the summaries are addressed. Sportsfan77777 ( talk) 09:11, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Placing on hold. Sportsfan77777 ( talk) 17:28, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk)
01:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Riley1012 ( talk). Self-nominated at 18:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC).
To T:DYK/P2 without image (for now)
![]() | Rebeca Andrade has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 6, 2022. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Rebeca Andrade is the first Brazilian female gymnast to win a medal
at the Olympic Games? |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Heard an NBC pundit make a passing mention of it. 161.185.160.74 ( talk) 21:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sportsfan77777 ( talk · contribs) 08:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
I'll review. Sportsfan77777 ( talk) 08:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
A general issue is that while you may do a good job of listing out all of her accomplishments year to year, there should be summaries in each subsection (probably at the beginning, or maybe at the end) that synthesize the results in that subsection. Without that, it is not so clear how good or bad each year was, or potentially what was the significance of the events that aren't the Olympics or Worlds, or which event she is focusing on or did the best in (if any). Along those lines, it may also be worth combining more pairs or sets of years together, as the summaries may be better suited to cover multiple years.
Beyond the summaries, a lesser similar issue is that the flow is also not always the best. It seems like most subsections are commonly strung together as "She competed at Competition 1. She won [insert color] medal in Event A and finished #th in Event B. She then entered Competition 2, and won [insert color] medal in Event B and finished #th in Event C". Improving the flow a bit might go hand-in-hand with adding the summaries.
I don't have any gymnastics examples of what I mean by summaries, but here are some tennis examples:
I'll review the article section-by-section after the summaries are addressed. Sportsfan77777 ( talk) 09:11, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Placing on hold. Sportsfan77777 ( talk) 17:28, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk)
01:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Riley1012 ( talk). Self-nominated at 18:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC).
To T:DYK/P2 without image (for now)