![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | On 25 July 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Rear projection effect to Rear projection. The result of the discussion was moved. |
I disagree with what is said, or at least I have my doubts, in the 1931 film "Emil und die Detektive" there is a shot on a train, which looks a lot like rear projection. Juan Schwarz 23:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
I wrote a new article for the entry compositing, which contains a section on rear projection. The information is accurate and supplied with references. I cannot vouch for much of the info in the history section of the present article, but the sentence
"Finally, the larger film gauges beginning to emerge in the late 1920s demanded more powerful projection lamps, which were subsequently available for making the rear projection screen brighter and thus more properly exposed." Does not make sense. With the possible exception of scattered experiments with larger film sizes, there were no new film gauges introduced in this period.
Also, panchromatic (pan-chromatic = all colors) film was superior to orthochromatic in that its recording of all colors (rather than only the bluish end of the visible spectrum) allowed less stylized makeup, improved contrast gradation, and a generally superior gray-scale rendition of colors (although colors like red and green could be indistinguishable without filtration). But how it made background plates practical is unclear to me. Jim Stinson 22:24, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
I can't find a single off-Wiki source that uses the word "effect" in the term. I propose removing it, as there is a redir of that name an no overlapping terms. Maury ( talk) 17:13, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
If so, could someone fit the term in? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.100.190.141 ( talk) 05:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
‘he has been described as one of the few people in Hollywood still able to understand and use process photography as an effective technique’
This sentence sounds like something you'd read in an advertisement or a cinema gossip magazine, not one would read in an encyclopaedia. It mainly banks on the reputation of the person, sounding positive while being vague about what, if anything, is actually meant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.114.146.117 ( talk) 01:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 ( talk) 17:23, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Rear projection effect → Rear projection – Reverse the redirect per WP:CONCISE As discussed briefly in 2008 and 2015, this is the natural title (if not Back projection, perhaps that is MOS:ENGVAR?) 85.67.32.244 ( talk) 11:14, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | On 25 July 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Rear projection effect to Rear projection. The result of the discussion was moved. |
I disagree with what is said, or at least I have my doubts, in the 1931 film "Emil und die Detektive" there is a shot on a train, which looks a lot like rear projection. Juan Schwarz 23:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
I wrote a new article for the entry compositing, which contains a section on rear projection. The information is accurate and supplied with references. I cannot vouch for much of the info in the history section of the present article, but the sentence
"Finally, the larger film gauges beginning to emerge in the late 1920s demanded more powerful projection lamps, which were subsequently available for making the rear projection screen brighter and thus more properly exposed." Does not make sense. With the possible exception of scattered experiments with larger film sizes, there were no new film gauges introduced in this period.
Also, panchromatic (pan-chromatic = all colors) film was superior to orthochromatic in that its recording of all colors (rather than only the bluish end of the visible spectrum) allowed less stylized makeup, improved contrast gradation, and a generally superior gray-scale rendition of colors (although colors like red and green could be indistinguishable without filtration). But how it made background plates practical is unclear to me. Jim Stinson 22:24, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
I can't find a single off-Wiki source that uses the word "effect" in the term. I propose removing it, as there is a redir of that name an no overlapping terms. Maury ( talk) 17:13, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
If so, could someone fit the term in? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.100.190.141 ( talk) 05:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
‘he has been described as one of the few people in Hollywood still able to understand and use process photography as an effective technique’
This sentence sounds like something you'd read in an advertisement or a cinema gossip magazine, not one would read in an encyclopaedia. It mainly banks on the reputation of the person, sounding positive while being vague about what, if anything, is actually meant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.114.146.117 ( talk) 01:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 ( talk) 17:23, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Rear projection effect → Rear projection – Reverse the redirect per WP:CONCISE As discussed briefly in 2008 and 2015, this is the natural title (if not Back projection, perhaps that is MOS:ENGVAR?) 85.67.32.244 ( talk) 11:14, 25 July 2021 (UTC)