 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Reads like a company brochure.
- I agree. No discussion about how it's basically a DRM-cum-corporate lock-in scheme in waiting. 18:02, 7 August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
129.67.119.98 (
talk)
- That comment could do with amplification! The text 'While it does, to an extent, provide free online access to articles, it is not a true open access scheme' partly answers the complaint, and I don't see the article being that biased. -- Brian Josephson ( talk) 11:21, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
| This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Reads like a company brochure.
- I agree. No discussion about how it's basically a DRM-cum-corporate lock-in scheme in waiting. 18:02, 7 August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
129.67.119.98 (
talk)
- That comment could do with amplification! The text 'While it does, to an extent, provide free online access to articles, it is not a true open access scheme' partly answers the complaint, and I don't see the article being that biased. -- Brian Josephson ( talk) 11:21, 25 April 2019 (UTC)