![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WHICH COMMUNAL PERSON WROTE THIS ARTICLE? how could such communal articles survive so long in wikipedia? I am shocked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.173.182.227 ( talk) 15:00, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
This article is a complete lie, Razakars were worse then nazis and were no way the victims. This article needs to be rewritten by using neutral publications(many western new outlets have the story). Article has now been corrected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.69.86.74 ( talk) 04:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Agreed. Even someone with as minimal awareness of this area of history as me can tell that it is written in a very biased tone. Furthermore, there are no citations at all. Someone familiar with this area should enlighten us! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.255.2.59 ( talk) 15:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Biased article.. Needs a neutral re-write.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.243.85.52 ( talk) 00:53, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
This article is 100% far from facts. Even the statistics is wrong. Read the book from the link, for more information [pages 10-13]. The information presented about Razakars in this article is well beyond a pool of absolute lies.
This language is far too emotive which means it doesn't sound impartial. It needs to be rewritten and sourced or if it's from a book, use a direct quotation. -- Ganpati23 ( talk) 20:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
1 more... just gathering online references.
"Captain L. Pandu Ranga Reddy while addressing the function said that a particular community is being targeted in the name of Razakar which is not appropriate.
"In fact the Andhra communist Razakars who were struggling against the Nizam were looters. In addition to this, there were Congress Razakars too, who looted Umri Bank. reference: http://www.ummid.com/news/2014/February/04.02.2014/seminar-on-nizam.html -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.123.62.200 ( talk • contribs)
This is from the mouth of the famous Captain L. Pandhu Ranga Reddy himself [1]
References
Whoisabby, I have reverted your addition. In addition to the newspaper history issue already discussed above, you are also enlarging the scope of the page by using new definitions of the subject of this page. You cannot do that without discussing and achieving WP:CONSENSUS to expand the scope.
Your citation for Kane, p.77 did not produce anything. The fact that P. Sundarayya uses "Congress razakar" does not mean anything. He is the leader of a rival party, hardly a reliable source. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 23:31, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
New info is added with references from Books and other sources. However all the edits were reverted by Kautilya3 stating two reasons - WP:UNDUE & WP:PRIMARY. This needs to be discussed. Anand2202 ( talk) 03:43, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
P. Sundarayya has always been rejected as RS on this page. See, e.g., the section immediately above. He was a politician, activist and rebel. His views cannot be reproduced in Wikipedia voice.
Then you used an S. Chand book that is supposed to be preparatory book for competitive exams. No citations. No reviews. Not scholarly at all. Why aren't you using the solid sources already listed in Bibliography?
If you want to do a major expansion of the article, you need to do it one section at a time. And do it slowly enough that we can review them. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 09:31, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Doesn't this article need an "Atrocities" section as a main component ? It is a known fact Massive atrocities were perpetrated by the Razakars on the general populace especially Hindus. Sources are easily available. SatyaAmarRahe ( talk) 16:20, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WHICH COMMUNAL PERSON WROTE THIS ARTICLE? how could such communal articles survive so long in wikipedia? I am shocked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.173.182.227 ( talk) 15:00, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
This article is a complete lie, Razakars were worse then nazis and were no way the victims. This article needs to be rewritten by using neutral publications(many western new outlets have the story). Article has now been corrected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.69.86.74 ( talk) 04:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Agreed. Even someone with as minimal awareness of this area of history as me can tell that it is written in a very biased tone. Furthermore, there are no citations at all. Someone familiar with this area should enlighten us! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.255.2.59 ( talk) 15:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Biased article.. Needs a neutral re-write.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.243.85.52 ( talk) 00:53, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
This article is 100% far from facts. Even the statistics is wrong. Read the book from the link, for more information [pages 10-13]. The information presented about Razakars in this article is well beyond a pool of absolute lies.
This language is far too emotive which means it doesn't sound impartial. It needs to be rewritten and sourced or if it's from a book, use a direct quotation. -- Ganpati23 ( talk) 20:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
1 more... just gathering online references.
"Captain L. Pandu Ranga Reddy while addressing the function said that a particular community is being targeted in the name of Razakar which is not appropriate.
"In fact the Andhra communist Razakars who were struggling against the Nizam were looters. In addition to this, there were Congress Razakars too, who looted Umri Bank. reference: http://www.ummid.com/news/2014/February/04.02.2014/seminar-on-nizam.html -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.123.62.200 ( talk • contribs)
This is from the mouth of the famous Captain L. Pandhu Ranga Reddy himself [1]
References
Whoisabby, I have reverted your addition. In addition to the newspaper history issue already discussed above, you are also enlarging the scope of the page by using new definitions of the subject of this page. You cannot do that without discussing and achieving WP:CONSENSUS to expand the scope.
Your citation for Kane, p.77 did not produce anything. The fact that P. Sundarayya uses "Congress razakar" does not mean anything. He is the leader of a rival party, hardly a reliable source. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 23:31, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
New info is added with references from Books and other sources. However all the edits were reverted by Kautilya3 stating two reasons - WP:UNDUE & WP:PRIMARY. This needs to be discussed. Anand2202 ( talk) 03:43, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
P. Sundarayya has always been rejected as RS on this page. See, e.g., the section immediately above. He was a politician, activist and rebel. His views cannot be reproduced in Wikipedia voice.
Then you used an S. Chand book that is supposed to be preparatory book for competitive exams. No citations. No reviews. Not scholarly at all. Why aren't you using the solid sources already listed in Bibliography?
If you want to do a major expansion of the article, you need to do it one section at a time. And do it slowly enough that we can review them. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 09:31, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Doesn't this article need an "Atrocities" section as a main component ? It is a known fact Massive atrocities were perpetrated by the Razakars on the general populace especially Hindus. Sources are easily available. SatyaAmarRahe ( talk) 16:20, 7 April 2023 (UTC)