Disambiguation | ||||
|
Look at the number of pages that link to ray tracing (graphics). Then look at how many link to ray tracing (physics). Then look me in the eye and try to tell me that the two articles are equally referenced.
When this page points to the DAB page instead of Ray tracing (graphics), you break a proper link from no less than 154 articles. Please do not point this page at the DAB. Timrb ( talk) 13:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
I know of many physics students that were looking up information on Ray tracing, but when they came to wikipedia, they saw the graphics article and looked puzzled. Of course I showed some of them the little {{otheruses|}} note at the top of the page, but none of them would have seen it on their own. I think that the DAB is correctly justified considering the usage of both articles (even if the graphics one has more wikilinks). Does anyone have access to WP:AWB, that should make fixing all the links a lot faster. -- penubag ( talk) 04:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
It seems to me that this page should again be redirected to the dab page, to provide incentive for editors to fix the links and not to create new incorrect links.-- Srleffler ( talk) 23:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Why does Ray tracing lead to the graphics page but Ray Tracing lead to the disambiguation page? Rhetorical question. I'll try to fix it. ThisIsMyWikipediaName ( talk) 17:34, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Disambiguation | ||||
|
Look at the number of pages that link to ray tracing (graphics). Then look at how many link to ray tracing (physics). Then look me in the eye and try to tell me that the two articles are equally referenced.
When this page points to the DAB page instead of Ray tracing (graphics), you break a proper link from no less than 154 articles. Please do not point this page at the DAB. Timrb ( talk) 13:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
I know of many physics students that were looking up information on Ray tracing, but when they came to wikipedia, they saw the graphics article and looked puzzled. Of course I showed some of them the little {{otheruses|}} note at the top of the page, but none of them would have seen it on their own. I think that the DAB is correctly justified considering the usage of both articles (even if the graphics one has more wikilinks). Does anyone have access to WP:AWB, that should make fixing all the links a lot faster. -- penubag ( talk) 04:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
It seems to me that this page should again be redirected to the dab page, to provide incentive for editors to fix the links and not to create new incorrect links.-- Srleffler ( talk) 23:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Why does Ray tracing lead to the graphics page but Ray Tracing lead to the disambiguation page? Rhetorical question. I'll try to fix it. ThisIsMyWikipediaName ( talk) 17:34, 16 June 2008 (UTC)