This article was nominated for deletion on May 8, 2014. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This page should not be speedily deleted because it is a biography of an actor. It is properly sourced, and includes information one would want to know about the actor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lewis21841 ( talk • contribs)
Can somebody make the page semi-protected? Pineapple4321 ( talk) 01:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Shouldn't Mr. Fisher's recent issues with WB be mentioned in some form? He's been pretty public with his accusations. ★Trekker ( talk) 20:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Should we add a new section for the Justice League reshoots investigation? Pineapple4321 ( talk) 18:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
My viewpoint is that this article should focus more on Fisher's performance rather than the film itself. The film's reception by critics can be found in the film's article. I am also a bit skeptical of using strong terminology such as "good" or "mixed". It will open a can of worms as editors battle over the prose, which is why I thought we should follow the film page's prose if we are to include anything about the film's reception here. Pinging Kyle Joan to continue our debate here. -- WuTang94 ( talk) 19:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
garnered critical praisedespite those names not being anywhere in the prose. It is standard for BLPs to briefly note critics' consensuses about subjects' films–see Bradley Cooper, Anne Hathaway, Christian Bale, Jennifer Lawrence, all featured articles. Would you remove statements saying their films received whatever reviews from their articles? Why be skeptical about saying the reception was mixed when that's what the LA Times, TotalFilm, Collider, The Mary Sue, Syfy Wire, Metacritic, CNET, and ComicBook.com all say? If anyone wants to challenge the prose, then they're free to demonstrate that another term aside from "mixed" is due. Speaking of which, I thought you had wanted to do this, but it seems the scope of the discussion has changed because you now oppose any general consensus. What changed?
garnered critical praise) because readers could come to each person's article to find that information? In fact, shouldn't the names and photos be entirely removed because that material doesn't match what's on this article or Affleck's or Miller's?
Which of the following statements (all verifiable and due) about the critical reception of Zack Snyder's Justice League should be included in the article? And should the consensus here establish a precedent for future discussions about which sentiment to include on the film's other starring actors' BLPs (e.g., Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill, Amy Adams, etc.)?
KyleJoan talk 06:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Shouldn’t Ray Fishers Filmography be separated into film and television alone instead of mashing his film and television all together into one filmography one should just have his films separate from his television work don’t put them all together. 166.198.161.7 ( talk) 13:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on May 8, 2014. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This page should not be speedily deleted because it is a biography of an actor. It is properly sourced, and includes information one would want to know about the actor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lewis21841 ( talk • contribs)
Can somebody make the page semi-protected? Pineapple4321 ( talk) 01:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Shouldn't Mr. Fisher's recent issues with WB be mentioned in some form? He's been pretty public with his accusations. ★Trekker ( talk) 20:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Should we add a new section for the Justice League reshoots investigation? Pineapple4321 ( talk) 18:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
My viewpoint is that this article should focus more on Fisher's performance rather than the film itself. The film's reception by critics can be found in the film's article. I am also a bit skeptical of using strong terminology such as "good" or "mixed". It will open a can of worms as editors battle over the prose, which is why I thought we should follow the film page's prose if we are to include anything about the film's reception here. Pinging Kyle Joan to continue our debate here. -- WuTang94 ( talk) 19:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
garnered critical praisedespite those names not being anywhere in the prose. It is standard for BLPs to briefly note critics' consensuses about subjects' films–see Bradley Cooper, Anne Hathaway, Christian Bale, Jennifer Lawrence, all featured articles. Would you remove statements saying their films received whatever reviews from their articles? Why be skeptical about saying the reception was mixed when that's what the LA Times, TotalFilm, Collider, The Mary Sue, Syfy Wire, Metacritic, CNET, and ComicBook.com all say? If anyone wants to challenge the prose, then they're free to demonstrate that another term aside from "mixed" is due. Speaking of which, I thought you had wanted to do this, but it seems the scope of the discussion has changed because you now oppose any general consensus. What changed?
garnered critical praise) because readers could come to each person's article to find that information? In fact, shouldn't the names and photos be entirely removed because that material doesn't match what's on this article or Affleck's or Miller's?
Which of the following statements (all verifiable and due) about the critical reception of Zack Snyder's Justice League should be included in the article? And should the consensus here establish a precedent for future discussions about which sentiment to include on the film's other starring actors' BLPs (e.g., Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill, Amy Adams, etc.)?
KyleJoan talk 06:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Shouldn’t Ray Fishers Filmography be separated into film and television alone instead of mashing his film and television all together into one filmography one should just have his films separate from his television work don’t put them all together. 166.198.161.7 ( talk) 13:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC)