Ratchet & Clank (2002 video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
Actually, I'm only fixing the plot, and I got some screenshots. Abby724 16:40, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
For some reason, Ratchet_and_Clank_Gameplay.PNG isn't showing up in the article when I put it up. Yes, I know how to put up images, but it's just not showing up. Abby724 17:04, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
I don't think a collection of funny quotes from the game is relevant for this article. I suggest they be moved to Wikiquote. — Metamorf 04:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Parts of the "reception" section strike me as incredibly POV. I think a lot of those statements need to be removed unless they can be sourced. Objections? -- I agree --NLUT
Okay, replaced the "reception" section with a summary of what the game was praised and criticized for. Hopefully it's not quite as POV.
209.107.122.185 18:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
I will add screenshots, but the plot seems pretty complete.--Titan 17:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
I've made a big edit to the article to make in conform better to CVG standards.
Sections that currently need expanding:
Crimsonfox 13:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Image:Blackwater City.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:Fighting Qwark in Space.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 12:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Before you post WP:GAMEGUIDE, hear me out.
This series' signature is its odd and memorable weapons. At least in this case, a lsit of weapon names and functions would be appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.175.17.2 ( talk) 15:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Someone should nominate this as a good article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.218.12.31 ( talk) 00:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Someone has added stuff about porkchops in the references section. I'd fix it but im sort of new and not sure how to do ths stuf yet.Spongefrog 21:41, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Actually Ill just do it. Spongefrog 21:48, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Do you (Drilnoth) think the plot is short enough? I removed a relatively small amount from it, but I think its slightly shorter than Going Commando's plot section. I meant to add this yesterday, but there was some problem with the Wikimedia servers or sommething. Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 08:10, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Another thing. I found this being used as a cite on a previous version. I think it could be useful for the development section, but since it was removed I thought it might be unreliable. But if you think it only contains redundant information, just ignore the comment and save me the humiliation. Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 08:15, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Do you think this would be any good for referencing the plot? This message is aimed at Drilnoth, but you can still answer if you're not (obviously). Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 18:43, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
You're back!!!! That's what I thought too, I'll try to do a bit with it. Plot doesn't really need much more referencing, if anything it needs less. Would you say the article is almost C-Class now? Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 20:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Nothing really to say other than keep up the good work. It's definitely almost a B class, just feel a little more reception and expanding the other sections as you noted should bring it on home. Nicely done!-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 19:04, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
I am beginning a GA review of this article. Please feel free to leave any questions, comments and other reviews below. Thanks! Vicenarian ( T · C) 11:56, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
My GA review will be coming very soon. Thanks for your patience! Vicenarian ( Said · Done) 15:04, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
This is a well-written, MoS-compliant, easy-to-read article. It contains everything I would expect from an article of its type, in a concise and not overly "crufty" tone. I thought for a little while about whether it could use an additional screen capture or two (something to consider going forward), but decided that wasn't enough for it to fail the GAC. Neutral in tone, well-cited with well-formed references and stable. A job well done!
Vicenarian ( Said · Done) 16:25, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Ratchet & Clank (series) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 13:00, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
I've added a list of weapons, their cost (N/A indicates free, found or came at the start of the game) and the ammo type along with their maximum capacity. I haven't done the descriptions for them yet or the gadgets. - Wiltaprizes ( talk) 16:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ratchet & Clank (2002 video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://uk.gamespot.com/ps2/action/ratchetclank/news.html?sid=2894708&mode=recent&page=1When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:48, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Ratchet & Clank (2002 video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Actually, I'm only fixing the plot, and I got some screenshots. Abby724 16:40, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
For some reason, Ratchet_and_Clank_Gameplay.PNG isn't showing up in the article when I put it up. Yes, I know how to put up images, but it's just not showing up. Abby724 17:04, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
I don't think a collection of funny quotes from the game is relevant for this article. I suggest they be moved to Wikiquote. — Metamorf 04:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Parts of the "reception" section strike me as incredibly POV. I think a lot of those statements need to be removed unless they can be sourced. Objections? -- I agree --NLUT
Okay, replaced the "reception" section with a summary of what the game was praised and criticized for. Hopefully it's not quite as POV.
209.107.122.185 18:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
I will add screenshots, but the plot seems pretty complete.--Titan 17:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
I've made a big edit to the article to make in conform better to CVG standards.
Sections that currently need expanding:
Crimsonfox 13:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Image:Blackwater City.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:Fighting Qwark in Space.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 12:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Before you post WP:GAMEGUIDE, hear me out.
This series' signature is its odd and memorable weapons. At least in this case, a lsit of weapon names and functions would be appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.175.17.2 ( talk) 15:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Someone should nominate this as a good article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.218.12.31 ( talk) 00:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Someone has added stuff about porkchops in the references section. I'd fix it but im sort of new and not sure how to do ths stuf yet.Spongefrog 21:41, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Actually Ill just do it. Spongefrog 21:48, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Do you (Drilnoth) think the plot is short enough? I removed a relatively small amount from it, but I think its slightly shorter than Going Commando's plot section. I meant to add this yesterday, but there was some problem with the Wikimedia servers or sommething. Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 08:10, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Another thing. I found this being used as a cite on a previous version. I think it could be useful for the development section, but since it was removed I thought it might be unreliable. But if you think it only contains redundant information, just ignore the comment and save me the humiliation. Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 08:15, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Do you think this would be any good for referencing the plot? This message is aimed at Drilnoth, but you can still answer if you're not (obviously). Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 18:43, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
You're back!!!! That's what I thought too, I'll try to do a bit with it. Plot doesn't really need much more referencing, if anything it needs less. Would you say the article is almost C-Class now? Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 20:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Nothing really to say other than keep up the good work. It's definitely almost a B class, just feel a little more reception and expanding the other sections as you noted should bring it on home. Nicely done!-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 19:04, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
I am beginning a GA review of this article. Please feel free to leave any questions, comments and other reviews below. Thanks! Vicenarian ( T · C) 11:56, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
My GA review will be coming very soon. Thanks for your patience! Vicenarian ( Said · Done) 15:04, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
This is a well-written, MoS-compliant, easy-to-read article. It contains everything I would expect from an article of its type, in a concise and not overly "crufty" tone. I thought for a little while about whether it could use an additional screen capture or two (something to consider going forward), but decided that wasn't enough for it to fail the GAC. Neutral in tone, well-cited with well-formed references and stable. A job well done!
Vicenarian ( Said · Done) 16:25, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Ratchet & Clank (series) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 13:00, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
I've added a list of weapons, their cost (N/A indicates free, found or came at the start of the game) and the ammo type along with their maximum capacity. I haven't done the descriptions for them yet or the gadgets. - Wiltaprizes ( talk) 16:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ratchet & Clank (2002 video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://uk.gamespot.com/ps2/action/ratchetclank/news.html?sid=2894708&mode=recent&page=1When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:48, 23 January 2018 (UTC)