![]() | List of awards and nominations received by Rashmika Mandanna was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 15 June 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Rashmika Mandanna. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | Rashmika Mandanna has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 8, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rashmika Mandanna article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In this edit I removed the content stating "Rashmika has been recognized as the 'National Crush of India' for this year by Google." This is, to put it bluntly, horseshit. As far as I know, Google does not issue awards like this or make value-judgments about people or things. At best they'll tell you who the most-searched person in X region is.
The "recognition" that these idiotic gossip rags and news outlets have picked up on is more clearly explained in this article, where we learn that the "recognition" that is being alleged, is a complete misinterpretation of a Google search result as an award.
This site explains that if you search for "Nation Crush Of India 2020" (they mean National), Google will present a prioritised result with the text "Rashmika Mandanna has become the national crush of India. We love her outfit choices for sure, but for now, it is her radiant makeup look that we are after." This isn't Google offering their opinion about how stylish and pretty Mandanna is, this is text that appears to have originated here at charmboard.com, and it was written in February 2020. So these idiot websites are erroneously equating the opinion of a Charmboard user as the opinion of search engine Google, and of course nobody is asking any questions. This content doesn't belong in the article, as it is clearly incorrect and we are allowed to apply common sense. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 22:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
This article seems to be very poorly written especially the Career section. It cointains favourable reviews of her performances. Seems like a PR driven work. Can someone help in editing it out? defcon5 ( talk) 17:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb can you please help in resolving this edit war?? The article has citations leading to twitter, YouTube, personal blogs, unreliable sites like 123telegu.com, greatandhra.com Tollywood.net, chitramala , idlebrain, India glitz, chitraloka . It contains favourable reviews of performances and some unsourced number of theatrical conquests. I removed them. But they have been been reverted. As you are an admin and monitoring this article, I am reaching out to you for discussion. defcon5 ( talk) 11:26, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
I suggest that National Crush should be mentioned in this article. Not as an achievement but in some other way which I can't exactly make into words. I suggest this because even if that was user generated, it caught attention of mainstream media very much. This definitely increased her popularity across India, so this event is notable for her career, and so it is should be included.
See
https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2020-11-01&end=2020-12-31&pages=Rashmika_Mandanna . The views were shot up when news was doing rounds i.e. around 23 November 2020 --
Parnaval (
talk)
07:36, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Ab207 I wrote this section 2 months ago, No one gave reply so I/ thought it was best to add it. This was mentioned by me, not as recognition but just that people believed it that Google recognised. Please add it back as this incident is really notable as it had significant mainstream media attention. -- Parnaval ( talk) 13:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
@ NinadMysuru and Sathish Kathiravan: Decide here before reverting each other. Both Rashmika and Mandanna is currently used in article appox. 50 times. Out of this, 33 times it is used together i.e. Rashmika Mandanna. So decide one thing so we can change all instances. -- Parnaval ( talk) 09:27, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
I replaced Rashmika in place of Mandanna Msd fan ( talk) 10:38, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
She has 21million Instagram followers She got awardBest Actress In A Leading Role - Critics (Telugu) - Dear Comrade ❤ Best Actress In A Leading Role - Critics (Kannada) - Yajamana 2402:3A80:12AC:6C9C:84D2:369B:C3E:72DF ( talk) 14:48, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The language Telugu should be removed from the film Pogaru because the CBFC certificate ( https://www.facebook.com/110394494060512/photos/pcb.233656838400943/233656808400946/?type=3&theater) shows that the film is dubbed. DareshMohan ( talk) 01:18, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
@ Jayanthkumar123, you restored without any explanation content that I had removed with proper reasons. Can you explain why this page needs one photo each from the last three years or needs to quote every line that mentions her in movie reviews?
I've reverted you because I hardly see any encyclopedic value in sentences like "is easy that pin-up girl in college" or "is cute". If you want to restore specific parts, do go ahead but I've gone through every sentence and will challenge it. Wholesale restoration of such poor content isn't productive. Hemanthah ( talk) 11:11, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
keep it in one place. Taggede le can you answer my questions on content please. -- Hemanthah ( talk) 12:29, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Resist the temptation to overwhelm an article with images of marginal value simply because many images are available.
Animal and Vijay talapathy 66 movie 49.206.53.72 ( talk) 16:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
She is an ethenic Kodava ( Coorg ) her mother tongue is Kodava takk language. 2405:204:520D:4535:E9C2:C508:3783:5E7 ( talk) 14:08, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
It was announced that Rashmika Mandanna is the female lead opposite Vikram for his 61th film tentatively titled Chiyaan 61. 2001:8F8:1825:AE54:109E:60DE:653B:9EAF ( talk) 07:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I'm her personal assistant. I need to add many many good things about her. Can I edit. 2409:4073:2E96:862B:E892:7FFF:FEFD:CACE ( talk) 01:42, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
She is also the brand ambassador for the Indian division of anime licensing company Crunchyroll, having done livestreamed interviews with Crunchyroll spokespeople and an appearance at the 2024 Crunchyroll Anime Awards. She had also given them publicity on Instagram, praising their Tamil and Telugu dubs of Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba, Jujutsu Kaisen, and My Dress-Up Darling. 142.181.142.220 ( talk) 19:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
@ CNMall41, in all FA class articles information about the box-office results of the actor's film is given, so please stop recklessly editing. 19Arham ( talk) 20:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
@ 19Arham:, just checking to see if you had interest in cleaning up the referencing. Let me know as I would be happy to do it otherwise. We can then move on with discussing the GA if you like. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 03:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Here is the first example. Especially with entertainment, press releases are picked up and turned into WP:CHURNALISM quite often. In this one, you can see how that happened here, here and other places. One of the most telling indicators is the byline. Most of these are marked as "News Desk" or "Entertainment Desk." Some do not have any byline despite being published in a reliable source that normally has bylines (Times of India is the best across the board example of this). I replaced with the DNA India. I cannot find any indication on the WP:RSN that it is unreliable (you may correct me if I am wrong) and this has a byline indicating a staff writer wrote it (also indicating editorial oversight). This would alleviate any concerns over WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Let me know if this makes sense. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 23:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Magentic Manifestations ( talk · contribs) 09:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I will be taking this up for review. Expect comments shortly.
Magentic Manifestations (
talk)
09:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Not many issues. Some minor issues to be addressed, mentioned below the table. |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | As per MOS:CITELEAD, Lead section shall summarize the same and if it is already referenced, it is redundant and not required. |
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | As per MOS:ALLCAPS, remove citations with titles in caps. Ref #109, #143. As per WP:CITEFOOT, Move citations to after punctuation marks or end of the line. |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | see below |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | On the initial look, there seems to be sources provided for all the line. But on dipstick, there are lot of own research which the sources does not state. Comments below. |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | As per Earwig, there is 36.3% similarity, stemming from one dubious source 1, which seems to be a copyvio. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. | Comments need to be addressed. Putting it on hold for the time being to see if the user is ready to address the comments in the short time frame. Update: Passing it as the article has been improved to satisfy the GA criteria. |
19Arham, it would be better if you address each comment specifically and indicate the progress on how you had addressed it. On dipstick, there are still comments which are unaddressed. (E.g. still citations have all CAPS) You also seemed to have removed the entire section of her upcoming/future films, any reason? Magentic Manifestations ( talk) 05:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
19Arham ( talk) 21:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC).
![]() | List of awards and nominations received by Rashmika Mandanna was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 15 June 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Rashmika Mandanna. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | Rashmika Mandanna has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 8, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rashmika Mandanna article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In this edit I removed the content stating "Rashmika has been recognized as the 'National Crush of India' for this year by Google." This is, to put it bluntly, horseshit. As far as I know, Google does not issue awards like this or make value-judgments about people or things. At best they'll tell you who the most-searched person in X region is.
The "recognition" that these idiotic gossip rags and news outlets have picked up on is more clearly explained in this article, where we learn that the "recognition" that is being alleged, is a complete misinterpretation of a Google search result as an award.
This site explains that if you search for "Nation Crush Of India 2020" (they mean National), Google will present a prioritised result with the text "Rashmika Mandanna has become the national crush of India. We love her outfit choices for sure, but for now, it is her radiant makeup look that we are after." This isn't Google offering their opinion about how stylish and pretty Mandanna is, this is text that appears to have originated here at charmboard.com, and it was written in February 2020. So these idiot websites are erroneously equating the opinion of a Charmboard user as the opinion of search engine Google, and of course nobody is asking any questions. This content doesn't belong in the article, as it is clearly incorrect and we are allowed to apply common sense. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 22:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
This article seems to be very poorly written especially the Career section. It cointains favourable reviews of her performances. Seems like a PR driven work. Can someone help in editing it out? defcon5 ( talk) 17:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb can you please help in resolving this edit war?? The article has citations leading to twitter, YouTube, personal blogs, unreliable sites like 123telegu.com, greatandhra.com Tollywood.net, chitramala , idlebrain, India glitz, chitraloka . It contains favourable reviews of performances and some unsourced number of theatrical conquests. I removed them. But they have been been reverted. As you are an admin and monitoring this article, I am reaching out to you for discussion. defcon5 ( talk) 11:26, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
I suggest that National Crush should be mentioned in this article. Not as an achievement but in some other way which I can't exactly make into words. I suggest this because even if that was user generated, it caught attention of mainstream media very much. This definitely increased her popularity across India, so this event is notable for her career, and so it is should be included.
See
https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2020-11-01&end=2020-12-31&pages=Rashmika_Mandanna . The views were shot up when news was doing rounds i.e. around 23 November 2020 --
Parnaval (
talk)
07:36, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Ab207 I wrote this section 2 months ago, No one gave reply so I/ thought it was best to add it. This was mentioned by me, not as recognition but just that people believed it that Google recognised. Please add it back as this incident is really notable as it had significant mainstream media attention. -- Parnaval ( talk) 13:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
@ NinadMysuru and Sathish Kathiravan: Decide here before reverting each other. Both Rashmika and Mandanna is currently used in article appox. 50 times. Out of this, 33 times it is used together i.e. Rashmika Mandanna. So decide one thing so we can change all instances. -- Parnaval ( talk) 09:27, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
I replaced Rashmika in place of Mandanna Msd fan ( talk) 10:38, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
She has 21million Instagram followers She got awardBest Actress In A Leading Role - Critics (Telugu) - Dear Comrade ❤ Best Actress In A Leading Role - Critics (Kannada) - Yajamana 2402:3A80:12AC:6C9C:84D2:369B:C3E:72DF ( talk) 14:48, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The language Telugu should be removed from the film Pogaru because the CBFC certificate ( https://www.facebook.com/110394494060512/photos/pcb.233656838400943/233656808400946/?type=3&theater) shows that the film is dubbed. DareshMohan ( talk) 01:18, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
@ Jayanthkumar123, you restored without any explanation content that I had removed with proper reasons. Can you explain why this page needs one photo each from the last three years or needs to quote every line that mentions her in movie reviews?
I've reverted you because I hardly see any encyclopedic value in sentences like "is easy that pin-up girl in college" or "is cute". If you want to restore specific parts, do go ahead but I've gone through every sentence and will challenge it. Wholesale restoration of such poor content isn't productive. Hemanthah ( talk) 11:11, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
keep it in one place. Taggede le can you answer my questions on content please. -- Hemanthah ( talk) 12:29, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Resist the temptation to overwhelm an article with images of marginal value simply because many images are available.
Animal and Vijay talapathy 66 movie 49.206.53.72 ( talk) 16:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
She is an ethenic Kodava ( Coorg ) her mother tongue is Kodava takk language. 2405:204:520D:4535:E9C2:C508:3783:5E7 ( talk) 14:08, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
It was announced that Rashmika Mandanna is the female lead opposite Vikram for his 61th film tentatively titled Chiyaan 61. 2001:8F8:1825:AE54:109E:60DE:653B:9EAF ( talk) 07:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I'm her personal assistant. I need to add many many good things about her. Can I edit. 2409:4073:2E96:862B:E892:7FFF:FEFD:CACE ( talk) 01:42, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
She is also the brand ambassador for the Indian division of anime licensing company Crunchyroll, having done livestreamed interviews with Crunchyroll spokespeople and an appearance at the 2024 Crunchyroll Anime Awards. She had also given them publicity on Instagram, praising their Tamil and Telugu dubs of Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba, Jujutsu Kaisen, and My Dress-Up Darling. 142.181.142.220 ( talk) 19:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
@ CNMall41, in all FA class articles information about the box-office results of the actor's film is given, so please stop recklessly editing. 19Arham ( talk) 20:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
@ 19Arham:, just checking to see if you had interest in cleaning up the referencing. Let me know as I would be happy to do it otherwise. We can then move on with discussing the GA if you like. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 03:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Here is the first example. Especially with entertainment, press releases are picked up and turned into WP:CHURNALISM quite often. In this one, you can see how that happened here, here and other places. One of the most telling indicators is the byline. Most of these are marked as "News Desk" or "Entertainment Desk." Some do not have any byline despite being published in a reliable source that normally has bylines (Times of India is the best across the board example of this). I replaced with the DNA India. I cannot find any indication on the WP:RSN that it is unreliable (you may correct me if I am wrong) and this has a byline indicating a staff writer wrote it (also indicating editorial oversight). This would alleviate any concerns over WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Let me know if this makes sense. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 23:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Magentic Manifestations ( talk · contribs) 09:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I will be taking this up for review. Expect comments shortly.
Magentic Manifestations (
talk)
09:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Not many issues. Some minor issues to be addressed, mentioned below the table. |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | As per MOS:CITELEAD, Lead section shall summarize the same and if it is already referenced, it is redundant and not required. |
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | As per MOS:ALLCAPS, remove citations with titles in caps. Ref #109, #143. As per WP:CITEFOOT, Move citations to after punctuation marks or end of the line. |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | see below |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | On the initial look, there seems to be sources provided for all the line. But on dipstick, there are lot of own research which the sources does not state. Comments below. |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | As per Earwig, there is 36.3% similarity, stemming from one dubious source 1, which seems to be a copyvio. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. | Comments need to be addressed. Putting it on hold for the time being to see if the user is ready to address the comments in the short time frame. Update: Passing it as the article has been improved to satisfy the GA criteria. |
19Arham, it would be better if you address each comment specifically and indicate the progress on how you had addressed it. On dipstick, there are still comments which are unaddressed. (E.g. still citations have all CAPS) You also seemed to have removed the entire section of her upcoming/future films, any reason? Magentic Manifestations ( talk) 05:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
19Arham ( talk) 21:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC).