This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it is about one of the most watched pranksters on the Internet. His creations have been featured on popular TV shows on several different occasions. If this should be deleted immediately, then I would suggest deleting pages about every other YouTube prankster on Wikipedia, such as Roman Atwood. This page is highly in need, as if you enter "MagicofRahat" on Google, you will find that the second suggestion is "MagicofRahat wiki." -- Temple of the Mousy ( talk) 14:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
@ Psychedelia: As far as I can see the disputed edit fails WP:RS and WP:BIO which are policies. I can't find anything in WP:VIDEOREF that would justify its use as a source here either, aside from that even if that were the case WP:VIDEOREF would be overruled by WP:RS and WP:BIO as the former is merely a supplementary note and not a guideline or policy whereas the latter two are. So unless you can provide a convincing reason why that Youtube video would pass WP:RS and is not violating WP:BIO, I will delete that edit again.
Also note that I'm already the 2nd longterm editor, who deleted your edit and pointed out the issue with content and sourcing. If you don't trust my assessment feel free to enlist further assessment by other editors at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. However do not simply revert future deletions without getting consent from the other involved editors.-- Kmhkmh ( talk) 19:57, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
https://imgur.com/a/ZkfIDh1 As everyone knows, imgur is a shady company, and they might delete it without notice. 2600:1006:B012:A207:3CFF:89BE:D6A8:CCB1 ( talk) 01:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it is about one of the most watched pranksters on the Internet. His creations have been featured on popular TV shows on several different occasions. If this should be deleted immediately, then I would suggest deleting pages about every other YouTube prankster on Wikipedia, such as Roman Atwood. This page is highly in need, as if you enter "MagicofRahat" on Google, you will find that the second suggestion is "MagicofRahat wiki." -- Temple of the Mousy ( talk) 14:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
@ Psychedelia: As far as I can see the disputed edit fails WP:RS and WP:BIO which are policies. I can't find anything in WP:VIDEOREF that would justify its use as a source here either, aside from that even if that were the case WP:VIDEOREF would be overruled by WP:RS and WP:BIO as the former is merely a supplementary note and not a guideline or policy whereas the latter two are. So unless you can provide a convincing reason why that Youtube video would pass WP:RS and is not violating WP:BIO, I will delete that edit again.
Also note that I'm already the 2nd longterm editor, who deleted your edit and pointed out the issue with content and sourcing. If you don't trust my assessment feel free to enlist further assessment by other editors at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. However do not simply revert future deletions without getting consent from the other involved editors.-- Kmhkmh ( talk) 19:57, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
https://imgur.com/a/ZkfIDh1 As everyone knows, imgur is a shady company, and they might delete it without notice. 2600:1006:B012:A207:3CFF:89BE:D6A8:CCB1 ( talk) 01:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)