![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I know sources that firmly put Radio Islam in the holocaust denial camp. I bet I could find more. But I have not stumbled upon paragraphs where it is said that they deny the views of "all scholars" (seems somewhat hyperbole) and similar analysis of Radio Islams publishings present in this article. In general, this article needs more citations. Steinberger ( talk) 06:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
An RfC:
Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the
Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. –
MrX
17:13, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Since someone has objected to its removal: I feel we can't link to WND (outside of a few situations where the article itself is specifically about them or their opinions) because they fail WP:ELNO point two, which forbids "Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research, except to a limited extent in articles about the viewpoints that the site is presenting." WND is infamous for spreading conspiracy theories and publishing inaccurate material without retractions, so they can't be used as an external link. (I think in this case ELNO point 1 might also apply - what unique resource is it supposed to offer here? - but ELNO point 2 definitely does. We can't use a conspiracy-theory hub as an external link in a context like this.) -- Aquillion ( talk) 18:46, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Radio Islam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:59, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I know sources that firmly put Radio Islam in the holocaust denial camp. I bet I could find more. But I have not stumbled upon paragraphs where it is said that they deny the views of "all scholars" (seems somewhat hyperbole) and similar analysis of Radio Islams publishings present in this article. In general, this article needs more citations. Steinberger ( talk) 06:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
An RfC:
Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the
Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. –
MrX
17:13, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Since someone has objected to its removal: I feel we can't link to WND (outside of a few situations where the article itself is specifically about them or their opinions) because they fail WP:ELNO point two, which forbids "Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research, except to a limited extent in articles about the viewpoints that the site is presenting." WND is infamous for spreading conspiracy theories and publishing inaccurate material without retractions, so they can't be used as an external link. (I think in this case ELNO point 1 might also apply - what unique resource is it supposed to offer here? - but ELNO point 2 definitely does. We can't use a conspiracy-theory hub as an external link in a context like this.) -- Aquillion ( talk) 18:46, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Radio Islam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:59, 27 December 2017 (UTC)