![]() | Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Spelling and Grammar is atrocious, but I know very little about this woman. Can someone who does make this page more readable? Jessica lp ( talk) 18:13, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
The NYtimes article on her (Sept '07) states that her "last name" (actually her middle name, apparently used to hide her Jewish roots?) is actually pronounced "Zoey" NOT "Zoh" and that the latter pronunciation is an affectation she created. Thus, I think the article should clarify this. As it is, the article leaves the impression that her (fake) last/middle name is actually pronounced the way she created it.
Why all the stuff about rumours of what gossip websites say? This is unsubstantiated, and thus should be dumped.
Should we mention the public feuding btw her and former client Nicole Ritchie? [1]
Probably not, as the original post on Richie's myspace has been deleted.
I think at least with crediting Richie with participation of the boho chic look, it should state Richie and herself are estranged and no longer working together. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.43.200 ( talk) 14:52, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
If you check the link to Perezhilton.com, you'll find screen caps from her original myspace post.-- Agnaramasi 22:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Born in '71? yeah, right.
Can't find any. -- Catgut ( talk) 09:49, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Is intellius legit? Her husband roger isnt named 'rosenweig', it is berman, so this might not be the right rachel. Are the other names --ronald, leslie, lindsey, leshia, pamela-- her family members? I dont watch her show but perhaps she has named her family members?). Rachel definitely wasnt born in 81 like she is claiming, we need to prove it was 71. Or maybe 61 as she does look old and haggard. 64.26.99.120 ( talk) 23:00, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
I just added September 1 1971 based on these:
born September 1
http://nymag.com/daily/fashion/2010/09/happy_birthday_rachel_zoe_1.html
born in 1971
http://celebritybabies.people.com/2010/11/17/rachel-zoe-pregnant-expecting-first-child . I agree with you all that she looks way older than 39. She is wrinkly & haggardly ooking due to her
anorexia. But now since she is pregnant she must not be anorexic anymore. It will be good to see her gain weight & be healthy. Look @ how healthy
Nicole Richie is now that she has had 2 kids. Thank You.
69.243.24.147 (
talk)
22:29, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
People magazine and Ny mag are reputable. Are we not allowed to subtract? Is there a rule that the source has to explicitly say Rachel Zoe was bonr on 9.1.1971? I read you comment up above. You think it is best to leave out her DOB, but we have to have consensus. Many have posted 9.1.1971 as her DOB. I don't think it is fair for you to decide what the source will be and will say. I'm readding. 69.243.24.147 ( talk) 00:21, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Also, if IMDB is not a reliable source for DOB, why is the
Writers Guild of America and celebs trying to force it to not list their DOBs? The WGA said this :
IMDb is committed to being the most comprehensive source of film, TV and celebrity information. Customers of IMDb trust that when they use our website, they are receiving comprehensive and accurate biographical information. When we are made aware of information that can be verified as inaccurate, we remove from IMDb, as nothing is more important to us than customer trust."
Sources :
http://www.slashfilm.com/should-imdb-display-age-listings/
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/2010/06/18/2010-06-18_age_listings_provoke_feud_between_writers_guild_of_america_and_imdbcom.html
"The Guild has a contract with IMDb to provide credits information and does not release information on age," Neal Sacharow, a spokesperson for the WGA, told TheWrap.com. "We have raised our concerns with IMDb about its listing of ages." In most cases, individuals or their publicists provide the biographical data for their IMDb profiles ...IMDb will only remove it if it is inaccurate, an IMDb spokesperson told TheWrap..
So why is imdb an unrealiable source?
69.243.24.147 (
talk)
00:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
I see your an *ss, you're being unreasonable. Let's ask for help.
69.243.24.147 (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added
03:25, 30 November 2010 (UTC).
I think that the photo on this article is a bit unfair and unflattering to Ms Zoe. It shows her nipples! I don't think that is a fair representation of this hard working, stylish woman. Maybe some of you guys like it but that's not a great reason.
Does anyone agree? Vintageandhaute ( talk) 19:43, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Unflattering? Offensive? Perhaps both, maybe neither. Point being, it is Zoe. She allowed the picture to be taken and was wearing that outfit for a portion of that day, it is, what it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.43.200 ( talk) 14:57, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
{{
help|
New York (magazine) states that RZ was born 1 Sept. This is a well known fact she has posts bday messages to herself on this day and has been have a borthday party on /around 1 Sept for years now. So why is the NY mag link not acceptable?
People (magazine) states RZ is 39, so subtraction means she was born in 1971.
George Washington University
states she graduated in 93 so after subtracting we agin get 71.
I did read WPBLP. Self sources from the person are allowed so long as the arent self promotion. So doesnt this mean RZ stating on her twitter that her birthday is 1 Sept is a reliable source?
Thank You to who ever or whom ever helps us.
69.243.24.147 (
talk)
03:38, 30 November 2010 (UTC)}}
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Rachel Zoe. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:11, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Spelling and Grammar is atrocious, but I know very little about this woman. Can someone who does make this page more readable? Jessica lp ( talk) 18:13, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
The NYtimes article on her (Sept '07) states that her "last name" (actually her middle name, apparently used to hide her Jewish roots?) is actually pronounced "Zoey" NOT "Zoh" and that the latter pronunciation is an affectation she created. Thus, I think the article should clarify this. As it is, the article leaves the impression that her (fake) last/middle name is actually pronounced the way she created it.
Why all the stuff about rumours of what gossip websites say? This is unsubstantiated, and thus should be dumped.
Should we mention the public feuding btw her and former client Nicole Ritchie? [1]
Probably not, as the original post on Richie's myspace has been deleted.
I think at least with crediting Richie with participation of the boho chic look, it should state Richie and herself are estranged and no longer working together. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.43.200 ( talk) 14:52, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
If you check the link to Perezhilton.com, you'll find screen caps from her original myspace post.-- Agnaramasi 22:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Born in '71? yeah, right.
Can't find any. -- Catgut ( talk) 09:49, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Is intellius legit? Her husband roger isnt named 'rosenweig', it is berman, so this might not be the right rachel. Are the other names --ronald, leslie, lindsey, leshia, pamela-- her family members? I dont watch her show but perhaps she has named her family members?). Rachel definitely wasnt born in 81 like she is claiming, we need to prove it was 71. Or maybe 61 as she does look old and haggard. 64.26.99.120 ( talk) 23:00, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
I just added September 1 1971 based on these:
born September 1
http://nymag.com/daily/fashion/2010/09/happy_birthday_rachel_zoe_1.html
born in 1971
http://celebritybabies.people.com/2010/11/17/rachel-zoe-pregnant-expecting-first-child . I agree with you all that she looks way older than 39. She is wrinkly & haggardly ooking due to her
anorexia. But now since she is pregnant she must not be anorexic anymore. It will be good to see her gain weight & be healthy. Look @ how healthy
Nicole Richie is now that she has had 2 kids. Thank You.
69.243.24.147 (
talk)
22:29, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
People magazine and Ny mag are reputable. Are we not allowed to subtract? Is there a rule that the source has to explicitly say Rachel Zoe was bonr on 9.1.1971? I read you comment up above. You think it is best to leave out her DOB, but we have to have consensus. Many have posted 9.1.1971 as her DOB. I don't think it is fair for you to decide what the source will be and will say. I'm readding. 69.243.24.147 ( talk) 00:21, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Also, if IMDB is not a reliable source for DOB, why is the
Writers Guild of America and celebs trying to force it to not list their DOBs? The WGA said this :
IMDb is committed to being the most comprehensive source of film, TV and celebrity information. Customers of IMDb trust that when they use our website, they are receiving comprehensive and accurate biographical information. When we are made aware of information that can be verified as inaccurate, we remove from IMDb, as nothing is more important to us than customer trust."
Sources :
http://www.slashfilm.com/should-imdb-display-age-listings/
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/2010/06/18/2010-06-18_age_listings_provoke_feud_between_writers_guild_of_america_and_imdbcom.html
"The Guild has a contract with IMDb to provide credits information and does not release information on age," Neal Sacharow, a spokesperson for the WGA, told TheWrap.com. "We have raised our concerns with IMDb about its listing of ages." In most cases, individuals or their publicists provide the biographical data for their IMDb profiles ...IMDb will only remove it if it is inaccurate, an IMDb spokesperson told TheWrap..
So why is imdb an unrealiable source?
69.243.24.147 (
talk)
00:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
I see your an *ss, you're being unreasonable. Let's ask for help.
69.243.24.147 (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added
03:25, 30 November 2010 (UTC).
I think that the photo on this article is a bit unfair and unflattering to Ms Zoe. It shows her nipples! I don't think that is a fair representation of this hard working, stylish woman. Maybe some of you guys like it but that's not a great reason.
Does anyone agree? Vintageandhaute ( talk) 19:43, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Unflattering? Offensive? Perhaps both, maybe neither. Point being, it is Zoe. She allowed the picture to be taken and was wearing that outfit for a portion of that day, it is, what it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.43.200 ( talk) 14:57, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
{{
help|
New York (magazine) states that RZ was born 1 Sept. This is a well known fact she has posts bday messages to herself on this day and has been have a borthday party on /around 1 Sept for years now. So why is the NY mag link not acceptable?
People (magazine) states RZ is 39, so subtraction means she was born in 1971.
George Washington University
states she graduated in 93 so after subtracting we agin get 71.
I did read WPBLP. Self sources from the person are allowed so long as the arent self promotion. So doesnt this mean RZ stating on her twitter that her birthday is 1 Sept is a reliable source?
Thank You to who ever or whom ever helps us.
69.243.24.147 (
talk)
03:38, 30 November 2010 (UTC)}}
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Rachel Zoe. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:11, 17 January 2016 (UTC)