This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If Josephus invented the Essenes, how can they be mentioned also in Philo and in Pliny? Das Baz 18:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
He didn't invent the Essenes. The article is saying that her theory is wrong precisely because the Essenes were mentioned before Jospehus ever wrote about them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.102.240 ( talk) 00:37, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
How does this article immediately start with a section on criticisms of Elior's work, without first giving any kind of description or outline of her work? How can an article criticize her viewpoints, with out first presenting her viewpoints as she herself presents them? Isn't this some kind of violation of Wikipedia policy? Or at least, of scholarly objectivity? Jimhoward72 ( talk) 10:04, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
A full academic biography of rachel elior is available in Rachel Elior's webpage under Curriculum Vitae http://pluto.huji.ac.il/~mselio/cv.html
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.180.236.212 ( talk) 19:53, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Rachel Elior. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If Josephus invented the Essenes, how can they be mentioned also in Philo and in Pliny? Das Baz 18:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
He didn't invent the Essenes. The article is saying that her theory is wrong precisely because the Essenes were mentioned before Jospehus ever wrote about them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.102.240 ( talk) 00:37, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
How does this article immediately start with a section on criticisms of Elior's work, without first giving any kind of description or outline of her work? How can an article criticize her viewpoints, with out first presenting her viewpoints as she herself presents them? Isn't this some kind of violation of Wikipedia policy? Or at least, of scholarly objectivity? Jimhoward72 ( talk) 10:04, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
A full academic biography of rachel elior is available in Rachel Elior's webpage under Curriculum Vitae http://pluto.huji.ac.il/~mselio/cv.html
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.180.236.212 ( talk) 19:53, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Rachel Elior. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)