This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
99.234.161.70 (
talk) 04:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
What was the actual punishment given to Khan for this?reply
Good question! I am that 3 year old female. I still an not clear on what was handed down to him. T —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
99.251.27.99 (
talk) 16:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)reply
same point from a different, and more wikipedian, perspective. the omission of the result of the second trial has to be seen, by any but the most disinterested reader, as a serious flaw in the article. as an american, i also find the apparent violation of what our legal system calls double jeopardy to be particularly interesting.
Toyokuni3 (
talk) 18:43, 27 January 2013 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
99.234.161.70 (
talk) 04:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
What was the actual punishment given to Khan for this?reply
Good question! I am that 3 year old female. I still an not clear on what was handed down to him. T —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
99.251.27.99 (
talk) 16:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)reply
same point from a different, and more wikipedian, perspective. the omission of the result of the second trial has to be seen, by any but the most disinterested reader, as a serious flaw in the article. as an american, i also find the apparent violation of what our legal system calls double jeopardy to be particularly interesting.
Toyokuni3 (
talk) 18:43, 27 January 2013 (UTC)reply