![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
_
_
I've removed the link somebody added to Wikipedia:Syndication per the avoid self-references policy. Basically, if you were to look at an encyclopedia article about RSS (in print, or on another website), you wouldn't expect that to get a prominent mention, so you shouldn't expect it here. There may be some argument for mentioning that link somewhere, perhaps using the "selfref" template, I think this disambiguation page would be too prominent a position anyway. Of course, anyone is entitled to disagree, so I thought I'd state my view here. - IMSoP 15:43, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
I don't see how RSS can possibly mean "Atom." That's like saying that Windows might mean Macintosh. Jsnell 00:36, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
I have changed the refence from "an extreme right wing..." to "a right wing...", because the earlier statement was POV. -- Andy123 11:51, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
I have changed it back to "a right-wing Indian Hindu organization". This is how the B.B.C. refers to this group.
Evox777 ( talk) 17:56, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
I've suggested a couple of times that there should be an entry to the networking interpretation of RSS. RSS is important to disambiguate because a simple Google search result in more than 2 billion hits.
RSS is a new technology buzzword in high performance networking. The best and most concise explanation of network RSS I know is on the Microsoft site (they standardized the process). A Wikipedia article on the subject would be basically saying the same thing, (though could add more detail such as history, but I don't know it), hence, I posted a link. It's just as important as many of the 802.3 minor standards.
Drdr6 ( talk) 18:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
This is not an official start of a primary topic discussion, but perhaps in lieu of one I thought I'd share the page view comparison of
RSS and
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, which is actually quite interesting:
[1]. The political party has been quite steady in the 50k to 100k monthly range for years, with a small uptick in recent months. RSS has sometimes been in that same range, but for the past year was consistently above 500k, and then a couple months ago suddenly plummeted 90% to 50k. Seems really hard to predict where those are going to go. My 2 cents: a solid argument could be made for there being no primary topic, but I think there's virtually no chance of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh becoming primary, even with long-term significance taken into account.
-- Fyrael (
talk)
15:26, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
_
_
I've removed the link somebody added to Wikipedia:Syndication per the avoid self-references policy. Basically, if you were to look at an encyclopedia article about RSS (in print, or on another website), you wouldn't expect that to get a prominent mention, so you shouldn't expect it here. There may be some argument for mentioning that link somewhere, perhaps using the "selfref" template, I think this disambiguation page would be too prominent a position anyway. Of course, anyone is entitled to disagree, so I thought I'd state my view here. - IMSoP 15:43, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
I don't see how RSS can possibly mean "Atom." That's like saying that Windows might mean Macintosh. Jsnell 00:36, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
I have changed the refence from "an extreme right wing..." to "a right wing...", because the earlier statement was POV. -- Andy123 11:51, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
I have changed it back to "a right-wing Indian Hindu organization". This is how the B.B.C. refers to this group.
Evox777 ( talk) 17:56, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
I've suggested a couple of times that there should be an entry to the networking interpretation of RSS. RSS is important to disambiguate because a simple Google search result in more than 2 billion hits.
RSS is a new technology buzzword in high performance networking. The best and most concise explanation of network RSS I know is on the Microsoft site (they standardized the process). A Wikipedia article on the subject would be basically saying the same thing, (though could add more detail such as history, but I don't know it), hence, I posted a link. It's just as important as many of the 802.3 minor standards.
Drdr6 ( talk) 18:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
This is not an official start of a primary topic discussion, but perhaps in lieu of one I thought I'd share the page view comparison of
RSS and
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, which is actually quite interesting:
[1]. The political party has been quite steady in the 50k to 100k monthly range for years, with a small uptick in recent months. RSS has sometimes been in that same range, but for the past year was consistently above 500k, and then a couple months ago suddenly plummeted 90% to 50k. Seems really hard to predict where those are going to go. My 2 cents: a solid argument could be made for there being no primary topic, but I think there's virtually no chance of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh becoming primary, even with long-term significance taken into account.
-- Fyrael (
talk)
15:26, 10 October 2019 (UTC)