![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As far as I remember it RARDEN actually stands for:
Royal Armaments Research & Development, ENfield. Ian Dunster 14:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
As a former user I can remember back in the late 70's early 80's they were fitted to ships. I seem to remember small patrol craft pictures with them mounted on the front and also possibly the RN had some fitted after the Falklands ? Jim Sweeney ( talk) 13:37, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Is it RARDEN or Rarden? Is it both? Currently, both are used very inconsistently here and elsewhere. TaintedMustard ( talk) 02:11, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
From frontal shots. Is it even credible? T-62 has 100 mm at 60°, it seems to me really a bit too much (not even a 83 mm APDS can KO's a T-62 in a reliable manner).
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As far as I remember it RARDEN actually stands for:
Royal Armaments Research & Development, ENfield. Ian Dunster 14:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
As a former user I can remember back in the late 70's early 80's they were fitted to ships. I seem to remember small patrol craft pictures with them mounted on the front and also possibly the RN had some fitted after the Falklands ? Jim Sweeney ( talk) 13:37, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Is it RARDEN or Rarden? Is it both? Currently, both are used very inconsistently here and elsewhere. TaintedMustard ( talk) 02:11, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
From frontal shots. Is it even credible? T-62 has 100 mm at 60°, it seems to me really a bit too much (not even a 83 mm APDS can KO's a T-62 in a reliable manner).