The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. No opposition. Primefac ( talk) 21:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC) reply

R. G. Jarvis → Ron Jarvis – The only cited source calls him Ron Jarvis, which is already a redirect to here. Dicklyon ( talk) 16:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC) reply

• Support WP:RECOGNIZABLE -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 19:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Comment. Looking at Google Books results there's not much in it "Ron Jarvis" 1660 results [1] versus "R. G. Jarvis" 1340 results [2] but the results for 'Ron Jarvis' look very random and don't necessarily relate to this topic. Zarcadia ( talk) 21:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC) reply

  I agree there are not many sources for this guy; most of those are not, and the ones that are (of the R. G. Jarvis) are from paper citations, not representative of what he would be called in a context that's not so strongly styled toward initials. Dicklyon ( talk) 22:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC) reply

  Actually, it looks like "Ronald Jarvis" would be an even better choice, more common in sources. Dicklyon ( talk) 22:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC) reply

• Relisting comment. Needs more input about, especially with Ron v Ronald. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC) reply
• Support "Ron Jarvis" per WP:COMMONNAME. It's used in the book written about him, which appears to be the best source available (and the only one cited here).-- Cúchullain ^t/ c 16:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.