This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

New York (state) Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

RE: Last few edits:

Is it an opinion? It is illegal/unconstitutional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.134.102.38 ( talk) 02:58, 30 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Please provide a verifiable source claiming this is unconstitutional. Or a source showing some group is challenging the constitutionality WP:V. - Jwc845 ( talk) 16:11, 12 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Apokrif ( talk) 03:28, 9 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Apokrif, the sentence originally read "a party must have (details)". When the law was changed, the edit that added "qualify every two years" failed to remove "have" (and also forgot to add "of"). I've fixed the sentence per the details in the source, and added an archive url since the source url is dead. Hopefully, the sentence makes sense now. Schazjmd  (talk) 23:32, 10 March 2023 (UTC) reply