![]() | Qinghe Special Steel Corporation disaster has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
May 29, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the
Qinghe Special Steel Corporation disaster involved 30
tons of liquid
steel at 1,500
°C, engulfing a room full of workers? | |||||||||
![]() | Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on April 18, 2023, and April 18, 2024. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Good addition, a few links, may help reduce the load on the existing sources, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18170087 http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/04/18/china.steel/index.html http://search.uk.reuters.com/rsearch/rcomSearch.do?blob=Qinghe%20&WTmodLoc=ussrch-top-quote feel free to use or ignore them. -- Drappel 16:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for those - I will definatly make use of them! Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 21:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
I've completed the review of this article and am pleased to pass this article as I believe it meets the Good Article Criteria.
The article is written well and covers the topic thoroughly. References are used everywhere that is appropriate, and the image used has a fair use rationale. I am satisfied that this article is written from a Neutral Point of View. It contains an impressive amount of information on such an event. I believe the editors have done excellent work to bring the article up to this standard considering the incident was just five months ago.
Thanks for all the hard work on this article, and congratulations on its promotion to good article status. Pursey Talk | Contribs 10:21, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello, @ David_Gerard! I have tentatively reverted one of your automated/scripted/blanket The Epoch Times removals of information on this event, pertaining to WP:RSCONTEXT. Though The Epoch Times has recently been deprecated, it seems as though, in this instance, the source use would fall under "Acceptable uses of deprecated sources" in WP:DEPS, as it is a highly localized/context citation about a particular incident that would be difficult to find, if at all, in other English-language publications. Top5a ( talk) 16:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
scripting mass removal/blacklistingThis is a specific accusation of malfeasance, and I would ask you to back it up or withdraw it, because it's false. So much for AGF.
Were the 4 arrested ever tried and convicted? If so what was their punishment? PhilUK ( talk) 12:43, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
The metal is described as coming directly from a blast furnace. In that case it would be pig iron, not steel, which would have received additional processing to remove impurities like carbon, silicon, and manganese. The properties and uses of the two materials are quite different. 64.7.42.170 ( talk) 12:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Qinghe Special Steel Corporation disaster has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
May 29, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the
Qinghe Special Steel Corporation disaster involved 30
tons of liquid
steel at 1,500
°C, engulfing a room full of workers? | |||||||||
![]() | Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on April 18, 2023, and April 18, 2024. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Good addition, a few links, may help reduce the load on the existing sources, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18170087 http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/04/18/china.steel/index.html http://search.uk.reuters.com/rsearch/rcomSearch.do?blob=Qinghe%20&WTmodLoc=ussrch-top-quote feel free to use or ignore them. -- Drappel 16:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for those - I will definatly make use of them! Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 21:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
I've completed the review of this article and am pleased to pass this article as I believe it meets the Good Article Criteria.
The article is written well and covers the topic thoroughly. References are used everywhere that is appropriate, and the image used has a fair use rationale. I am satisfied that this article is written from a Neutral Point of View. It contains an impressive amount of information on such an event. I believe the editors have done excellent work to bring the article up to this standard considering the incident was just five months ago.
Thanks for all the hard work on this article, and congratulations on its promotion to good article status. Pursey Talk | Contribs 10:21, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello, @ David_Gerard! I have tentatively reverted one of your automated/scripted/blanket The Epoch Times removals of information on this event, pertaining to WP:RSCONTEXT. Though The Epoch Times has recently been deprecated, it seems as though, in this instance, the source use would fall under "Acceptable uses of deprecated sources" in WP:DEPS, as it is a highly localized/context citation about a particular incident that would be difficult to find, if at all, in other English-language publications. Top5a ( talk) 16:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
scripting mass removal/blacklistingThis is a specific accusation of malfeasance, and I would ask you to back it up or withdraw it, because it's false. So much for AGF.
Were the 4 arrested ever tried and convicted? If so what was their punishment? PhilUK ( talk) 12:43, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
The metal is described as coming directly from a blast furnace. In that case it would be pig iron, not steel, which would have received additional processing to remove impurities like carbon, silicon, and manganese. The properties and uses of the two materials are quite different. 64.7.42.170 ( talk) 12:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)