A fact from Qaem 100 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 November 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to
Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please
join the project where you can contribute to the
discussions and help with our
open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
RoySmith (
talk) 15:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Article is new, and just big enough. No copyright problems detected. Tome is OK, but article is slightly POV as it misses out on some important info in the references, which is that Iran claims it is not for nuclear weapon delivery despite claims by other countries. All parts are fully cited.
Hook is not super exciting and I was not so clear what satellite carrier meant, is it a company or a truck? So perhaps we need a link. The hook is sufficiently short and is in article and referenced. Correct people credited, and QPQ performed. @
Mhhossein: Do you want to propose a variant of the hook with a link or more excitement, so that I can approve?
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 23:14, 14 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Thank you
Graeme Bartlett for the review. Do you like the following hook?
OK, that link makes it clear. So I will mark this ready.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 09:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
I'll promote this is a moment, but I do want to suggest that the article be moved to
Qaem 100. No need for the parenthetical disambiguation in the title. I'm not sure how that will affect the DYK process, so I'll leave it to somebody else to worry about. --
RoySmith(talk) 15:36, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
A fact from Qaem 100 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 November 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to
Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please
join the project where you can contribute to the
discussions and help with our
open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
RoySmith (
talk) 15:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Article is new, and just big enough. No copyright problems detected. Tome is OK, but article is slightly POV as it misses out on some important info in the references, which is that Iran claims it is not for nuclear weapon delivery despite claims by other countries. All parts are fully cited.
Hook is not super exciting and I was not so clear what satellite carrier meant, is it a company or a truck? So perhaps we need a link. The hook is sufficiently short and is in article and referenced. Correct people credited, and QPQ performed. @
Mhhossein: Do you want to propose a variant of the hook with a link or more excitement, so that I can approve?
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 23:14, 14 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Thank you
Graeme Bartlett for the review. Do you like the following hook?
OK, that link makes it clear. So I will mark this ready.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 09:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
I'll promote this is a moment, but I do want to suggest that the article be moved to
Qaem 100. No need for the parenthetical disambiguation in the title. I'm not sure how that will affect the DYK process, so I'll leave it to somebody else to worry about. --
RoySmith(talk) 15:36, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply