This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe this section could be omitted, and for two reasons: (i) there are repetitions (the imaginative use of the silent film form is already mentioned in the introduction), (ii) and the statement about it being received critically at the Cannes Film Festival needs qualification (if not, it appears as an unsubstantiated point of view or subjective impression). Also, a link is lacking to IMDB where it is shown that the film has obtained a 9.6 out of 10 ranking. Splashprince 05:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
I'd like to request for a consideration of this Wikipedia film article in terms of conciseness and the credibility of the information contained in it.
As a starting point, the review of readers and editors is requested of the following two versions of this article:
(go to article history link at http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Pushpak&action=history)
It would be appreciated if feedback could be provided on how this article could be improved, especially from the standpoint of conciseness and information credibility.
For a brief overview of one of the problems suffered by Indian film articles, see under Convention at the WikiProject Indian Cinema page [ [1]] Splashprince 07:47, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Article reads - "This movie was released in Tamil, Telugu, Hindi, Kannada and Malayalam." It is a silent movie man!!! How can it be released in different languages? -- gppande «talk» 08:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
The music for the film was by Vaidhyanathan, not VS Narashiman.
gppande, even though the film was dialogueless, there are a few voices like that of the a short radio broadcast (in a particular language ) railway announcements and those kind of things, and the intro titles are in a particular language. hence it was released in different languages though it is silent. it was not a classical silent film, it was just dialogue less.
Ro —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
116.75.131.138 (
talk) 17:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
The starting of the story in the summary is not written and confuse the readers by starting the story from the middle. We should atleast first include, "the movie follows an unnamed, almost penniless and unemployed youth whose fortunes change when he stumbles upon a millionaire drunk by the roadside. He takes the millionaire prisoner in his house and assumes his identity to taste the luxury of a five-star hotel" Read more at: http://entertainment.oneindia.in/telugu/movies/pushpaka-vimanam/story.html.
In casting Ramya is linked to Ramy Krishnan, which is wrong. Though her name is Ramya, it's not well known actress Ramya Krishnan.
And the article does not include about movie released in other languages. Pesum Padam in Tamil, Pushapaka vimanam in Telugu, Pushpak in Hindi and Pushapaka Vimana in Kannada. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icommoner ( talk • contribs) 15:07, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, can anyone please explain,.. this movie is belongs to Silent films or Films without speech? category - Sagotharan Jegadeeswaran ( talk) 15:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Pushpaka Vimana was never screened in any of the cannes film festival sections 1986 or 1987 or 1988 including film markets. Please advice User:Jayanthkumar123 to restrain from pov pushings. The sources which are included are predatory sources, the newspaper or media briefs were plagiarised, meaning those authors or journalists copy pasted unsourced content from earlier versions of pushpaka vimana (film) wikipedia article. No primary source from Cannes Festival available. Fostera12 ( talk) 10:32, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe this section could be omitted, and for two reasons: (i) there are repetitions (the imaginative use of the silent film form is already mentioned in the introduction), (ii) and the statement about it being received critically at the Cannes Film Festival needs qualification (if not, it appears as an unsubstantiated point of view or subjective impression). Also, a link is lacking to IMDB where it is shown that the film has obtained a 9.6 out of 10 ranking. Splashprince 05:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
I'd like to request for a consideration of this Wikipedia film article in terms of conciseness and the credibility of the information contained in it.
As a starting point, the review of readers and editors is requested of the following two versions of this article:
(go to article history link at http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Pushpak&action=history)
It would be appreciated if feedback could be provided on how this article could be improved, especially from the standpoint of conciseness and information credibility.
For a brief overview of one of the problems suffered by Indian film articles, see under Convention at the WikiProject Indian Cinema page [ [1]] Splashprince 07:47, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Article reads - "This movie was released in Tamil, Telugu, Hindi, Kannada and Malayalam." It is a silent movie man!!! How can it be released in different languages? -- gppande «talk» 08:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
The music for the film was by Vaidhyanathan, not VS Narashiman.
gppande, even though the film was dialogueless, there are a few voices like that of the a short radio broadcast (in a particular language ) railway announcements and those kind of things, and the intro titles are in a particular language. hence it was released in different languages though it is silent. it was not a classical silent film, it was just dialogue less.
Ro —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
116.75.131.138 (
talk) 17:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
The starting of the story in the summary is not written and confuse the readers by starting the story from the middle. We should atleast first include, "the movie follows an unnamed, almost penniless and unemployed youth whose fortunes change when he stumbles upon a millionaire drunk by the roadside. He takes the millionaire prisoner in his house and assumes his identity to taste the luxury of a five-star hotel" Read more at: http://entertainment.oneindia.in/telugu/movies/pushpaka-vimanam/story.html.
In casting Ramya is linked to Ramy Krishnan, which is wrong. Though her name is Ramya, it's not well known actress Ramya Krishnan.
And the article does not include about movie released in other languages. Pesum Padam in Tamil, Pushapaka vimanam in Telugu, Pushpak in Hindi and Pushapaka Vimana in Kannada. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icommoner ( talk • contribs) 15:07, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, can anyone please explain,.. this movie is belongs to Silent films or Films without speech? category - Sagotharan Jegadeeswaran ( talk) 15:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Pushpaka Vimana was never screened in any of the cannes film festival sections 1986 or 1987 or 1988 including film markets. Please advice User:Jayanthkumar123 to restrain from pov pushings. The sources which are included are predatory sources, the newspaper or media briefs were plagiarised, meaning those authors or journalists copy pasted unsourced content from earlier versions of pushpaka vimana (film) wikipedia article. No primary source from Cannes Festival available. Fostera12 ( talk) 10:32, 6 August 2022 (UTC)