This article was nominated for deletion on May 12, 2009. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

The film passes criteria 2 of Wikipedia:Notability_(films)#General_principles : Publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release. The movie has coverage on websites of several well-respected organisations including NY Times . -- Roaring Siren ( talk) 14:47, 12 May 2009 (UTC) reply

You are misquoting. Criterion 2 states: "The film is historically notable, as evidenced by one or more of the following:". This movie definitely isn't historically notable. It's a moot point, since a capsule review, even in the New York Times, doesn't count as "non-trivial". Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 15:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Not every film in wikipedia is "historically notable". What exactly is missing in the article ?. -- Roaring Siren ( talk) 15:13, 12 May 2009 (UTC) reply

That was your choice of criterion, not mine. See WP:MFA for help and make sure you read WP:RS. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 15:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC) reply