This article was nominated for deletion on 19 September 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Any thoughts on how things ought to be between the following titles and scopes? Do we have one article or more? Would WP:NOTABILITY support more than one?
Whatever happens, we have to keep scope of content and title aligned. Also, if there is a single article, the others will be redirects to here anyway. Andy Dingley ( talk) 23:48, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
So I think this needs to be cleared up: Who exactly is the talent? Are Mike Geier and Puddles one and the same? Is the story about Geier discovering a clown in some ramshackle bar in the '90s just folklore? Haven't been able to find anything verifiable on that. Needs to be addressed. Hhtesntwr ( talk) 19:19, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Why are YouTube videos not allowed to support up-to-date claims of the number of video viewer hits? Why is the entire YouTube site described as an "unreliable source" per se? Have these links they been banned, as such, at WT:IRS? Are there examples of other music-related articles where this has occurred? An expmple video is here.Thanks. Martinevans123 ( talk) 17:53, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Where is the evidence for that {{third-party|date=September 2017}} template? Is this meant to refer to YouTube videos, from Geier's own YT site, which have now been deemed to be no longer suitable, or to something else? Thanks. Martinevans123 ( talk) 18:08, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. Andrewa ( talk) 22:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Mike Geier → Puddles Pity Party – per WP:STAGENAME Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 22:47, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the message regarding my changes at Mike Geier. I did explain them in the edit summary section. In short: it was unneccesary detailed and contained what I call also-ism: he did ... he also did ... he also did ... I shortened it without leaving neccessary facts and resources out for sakes of coherence and style. While I think it debatable, to list every tv-show-appearance, but not neccessary wrong to do so, I think to recount them in great detail is, if the appearences weren't of greater importance, simply too much information. WP is not a fanpage! 95.90.115.121 ( talk) 14:32, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 19 September 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Any thoughts on how things ought to be between the following titles and scopes? Do we have one article or more? Would WP:NOTABILITY support more than one?
Whatever happens, we have to keep scope of content and title aligned. Also, if there is a single article, the others will be redirects to here anyway. Andy Dingley ( talk) 23:48, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
So I think this needs to be cleared up: Who exactly is the talent? Are Mike Geier and Puddles one and the same? Is the story about Geier discovering a clown in some ramshackle bar in the '90s just folklore? Haven't been able to find anything verifiable on that. Needs to be addressed. Hhtesntwr ( talk) 19:19, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Why are YouTube videos not allowed to support up-to-date claims of the number of video viewer hits? Why is the entire YouTube site described as an "unreliable source" per se? Have these links they been banned, as such, at WT:IRS? Are there examples of other music-related articles where this has occurred? An expmple video is here.Thanks. Martinevans123 ( talk) 17:53, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Where is the evidence for that {{third-party|date=September 2017}} template? Is this meant to refer to YouTube videos, from Geier's own YT site, which have now been deemed to be no longer suitable, or to something else? Thanks. Martinevans123 ( talk) 18:08, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. Andrewa ( talk) 22:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Mike Geier → Puddles Pity Party – per WP:STAGENAME Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 22:47, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the message regarding my changes at Mike Geier. I did explain them in the edit summary section. In short: it was unneccesary detailed and contained what I call also-ism: he did ... he also did ... he also did ... I shortened it without leaving neccessary facts and resources out for sakes of coherence and style. While I think it debatable, to list every tv-show-appearance, but not neccessary wrong to do so, I think to recount them in great detail is, if the appearences weren't of greater importance, simply too much information. WP is not a fanpage! 95.90.115.121 ( talk) 14:32, 18 June 2018 (UTC)