This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Rajasthan Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan (assessed as Low-importance). This redirect was last assessed in February 2015. Pakistan This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles

I think they're the same subject matter. Since nothing in Puar Rajputs is sourced, I suggested that the merge is just of any alternate spellings. I have no preference for whether Parmar should be merged into Puar or vice versa - that's a WP:COMMONNAME issue and I'm unsure. Sitush ( talk) 02:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC) reply

I am being bold and doing it. Deleting all content here and redirectin to Parmar. - Sitush ( talk) 12:25, 17 October 2017 (UTC) reply

I think wikipedia representatives have not properly studied the History of India, Gazetteer, Inscriptions, old scriptures and writing wrong History . This is objectionable . Correct names are to be written . If you are talking about Parmara then write Powar or Ponwar too . Because Powar /Ponwar / Parmara are same descendants of ancient Pramar Clan . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpowar ( talk • contribs) 06:58, 2 January 2018 (UTC) reply