![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 August 2020 and 23 November 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
TJEevee.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 07:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
"'Ployer' is a pseudoword in English, while 'dfhnxd' is not."
Pseudo my behind: ploy + -er == ployer, one who uses a tactic, strategy, or gimmick. -- Damian Yerrick ( talk | stalk) 00:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
I think this would be a great addition to wikipedia and could even be included in wiktionary.
for example: impractical is not word. I'm sure there are many more. Rotorius.kool ( talk) 00:20, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
I found a couple interesting ones, perhaps: the output of
grep "\(\w\w\w\w\w\w\)\1$" /usr/share/dict/words
(on my system anyway) is killeekillee and tangantangan, and yet I can't find any definition of the words online (other than on a tripod page), or use outside of Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science: Algorithms and Complexity - Volume 1 - Page 261.-- Elvey ( talk) 19:15, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Logatome gives practically the same definition, with the only difference being that it mentions usage in experiments in the psychology of learning. Allens ( talk) 00:32, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Done Consensus supported merger. And for good measure, I tossed in
Nonsense syllable, which was saying much the same thing as
Logatome. --
Damian Yerrick (
talk |
stalk)
23:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Some discussion about this topic at my userpage: User talk:Oiyarbepsy/2014#Pseudo-words and accidental gaps Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 04:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Is it just me, or does the second paragraph of the lede imply (or even explicitly state) that the words "ciphers" and "typos" are pseudowords? In any case, that whole paragraph seems to me to be rather poorly written. ComeAndHear ( talk) 04:58, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 August 2020 and 23 November 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
TJEevee.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 07:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
"'Ployer' is a pseudoword in English, while 'dfhnxd' is not."
Pseudo my behind: ploy + -er == ployer, one who uses a tactic, strategy, or gimmick. -- Damian Yerrick ( talk | stalk) 00:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
I think this would be a great addition to wikipedia and could even be included in wiktionary.
for example: impractical is not word. I'm sure there are many more. Rotorius.kool ( talk) 00:20, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
I found a couple interesting ones, perhaps: the output of
grep "\(\w\w\w\w\w\w\)\1$" /usr/share/dict/words
(on my system anyway) is killeekillee and tangantangan, and yet I can't find any definition of the words online (other than on a tripod page), or use outside of Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science: Algorithms and Complexity - Volume 1 - Page 261.-- Elvey ( talk) 19:15, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Logatome gives practically the same definition, with the only difference being that it mentions usage in experiments in the psychology of learning. Allens ( talk) 00:32, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Done Consensus supported merger. And for good measure, I tossed in
Nonsense syllable, which was saying much the same thing as
Logatome. --
Damian Yerrick (
talk |
stalk)
23:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Some discussion about this topic at my userpage: User talk:Oiyarbepsy/2014#Pseudo-words and accidental gaps Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 04:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Is it just me, or does the second paragraph of the lede imply (or even explicitly state) that the words "ciphers" and "typos" are pseudowords? In any case, that whole paragraph seems to me to be rather poorly written. ComeAndHear ( talk) 04:58, 16 July 2024 (UTC)