![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
What is Linux Land, and/or what's the address ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rautamiekka ( talk • contribs) 00:53, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
This is apparently intended as a tool to work specifically with Proxmox Virtual Environment, which is much more likely to be notable DGG ( talk ) 22:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
As of revision 1167643646, there are 48 unique reference URLs listed in the "References" section. There are 18 third-party sources, while 30 are primary sources.
Out of the 30 primary sources, Proxmox Administration Guide is referenced a total of 18 times (10 times to the PDF & 8 times to the HTML versions). If I've counted correctly, primary sources from the proxmox.com domain URL is referenced a total of 53 times for statements in the article (out of a total of 65 or 66 times something was referenced).
I've also counted the following generally unaccepted
WP:UGC sources:
Additionally, citation 43 seems to be original research or an unreferenced note thinly disguised as a reference.
So, out of those 18 third-party sources, this articles has only ~9 marginally reliable sources (7–8, 10–12, 14–15, 27, 41). For what the reliable sources are saying about the article subject, this article needs to be significantly shorter on this encyclopedia for verifiability according to policies than what it is right now. 84.250.15.152 ( talk) 01:25, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
"Development of Proxmox VE started when Dietmar Maurer and Martin Maurer, two Linux developers, found out OpenVZ had no backup tool and no management GUI. KVM was appearing at the same time in Linux, and was added shortly afterwards". What? First, how is "the time that Maurer's didn't find some things" relevant to the starting of ProxMox VE development? Was it just coincidental? Did they design ProxMod to supply just these two things to OpenVZ? Was it general dissatisfaction with OpenVZ, as represented by these two missing things, leading to Proxmox as an alternative product that happens to include these two things?
The second sentence appears to say that KVM was subsequently added to the list of things that Dietmar and Martin didn't find in OpenVZ. How is this relevant? Did that increase their motivation?
Or is that second sentence completely misplaced, and actually about a feature later _added_ to Proxmox ? If so, it implies that, prior to that, Proxmox had only two features: a backup tool and a management GUI. That seems unlikely, as where is the rest of the Virtual Environment? Unless perhaps Proxmox was indeed just two or three add-ons for OpenVZ. But if _that_ was the case, then there's a whole bunch of history missing to get us to (apparently) a fully fledged independent VE. Gwideman ( talk) 07:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
What is Linux Land, and/or what's the address ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rautamiekka ( talk • contribs) 00:53, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
This is apparently intended as a tool to work specifically with Proxmox Virtual Environment, which is much more likely to be notable DGG ( talk ) 22:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
As of revision 1167643646, there are 48 unique reference URLs listed in the "References" section. There are 18 third-party sources, while 30 are primary sources.
Out of the 30 primary sources, Proxmox Administration Guide is referenced a total of 18 times (10 times to the PDF & 8 times to the HTML versions). If I've counted correctly, primary sources from the proxmox.com domain URL is referenced a total of 53 times for statements in the article (out of a total of 65 or 66 times something was referenced).
I've also counted the following generally unaccepted
WP:UGC sources:
Additionally, citation 43 seems to be original research or an unreferenced note thinly disguised as a reference.
So, out of those 18 third-party sources, this articles has only ~9 marginally reliable sources (7–8, 10–12, 14–15, 27, 41). For what the reliable sources are saying about the article subject, this article needs to be significantly shorter on this encyclopedia for verifiability according to policies than what it is right now. 84.250.15.152 ( talk) 01:25, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
"Development of Proxmox VE started when Dietmar Maurer and Martin Maurer, two Linux developers, found out OpenVZ had no backup tool and no management GUI. KVM was appearing at the same time in Linux, and was added shortly afterwards". What? First, how is "the time that Maurer's didn't find some things" relevant to the starting of ProxMox VE development? Was it just coincidental? Did they design ProxMod to supply just these two things to OpenVZ? Was it general dissatisfaction with OpenVZ, as represented by these two missing things, leading to Proxmox as an alternative product that happens to include these two things?
The second sentence appears to say that KVM was subsequently added to the list of things that Dietmar and Martin didn't find in OpenVZ. How is this relevant? Did that increase their motivation?
Or is that second sentence completely misplaced, and actually about a feature later _added_ to Proxmox ? If so, it implies that, prior to that, Proxmox had only two features: a backup tool and a management GUI. That seems unlikely, as where is the rest of the Virtual Environment? Unless perhaps Proxmox was indeed just two or three add-ons for OpenVZ. But if _that_ was the case, then there's a whole bunch of history missing to get us to (apparently) a fully fledged independent VE. Gwideman ( talk) 07:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)