This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Prostitution in Denmark article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 26 May 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Re EepEep's edit; I think this material ought to stay. Its well cited and well written. I agree with EepEep's sentiment that it seems mostly relevent to prostituion in Europe rather than just Denmark, but I don't think the article as it stands is overcrowed and I think the material is relavent. Don't feel too strongly about this though. NickCT ( talk) 05:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Agree poor article. I have no idea why people think the US State Department is a reliable source for information on sex work - it is highly ideological, but appears on virtually every prostitution page in Wikipedia. Re above - suggest use actual TAMPEP report not news articles. Don't use terms like 'recent' they date rapidly. Articles need to be in past tense. Michael Goodyear ( talk) 16:45, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
I keep on reading about "the nordic model" of prostitution, which is apparently what Sweden is, or is defined by Sweden, or something like that. I think it means "Illegal to Buy Services". But the article Nordic_model is completely unrelated. Somebody needs to make an article by that name to explain the concept. OsamaBinLogin ( talk) 05:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Prostitution in Denmark article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 26 May 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Re EepEep's edit; I think this material ought to stay. Its well cited and well written. I agree with EepEep's sentiment that it seems mostly relevent to prostituion in Europe rather than just Denmark, but I don't think the article as it stands is overcrowed and I think the material is relavent. Don't feel too strongly about this though. NickCT ( talk) 05:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Agree poor article. I have no idea why people think the US State Department is a reliable source for information on sex work - it is highly ideological, but appears on virtually every prostitution page in Wikipedia. Re above - suggest use actual TAMPEP report not news articles. Don't use terms like 'recent' they date rapidly. Articles need to be in past tense. Michael Goodyear ( talk) 16:45, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
I keep on reading about "the nordic model" of prostitution, which is apparently what Sweden is, or is defined by Sweden, or something like that. I think it means "Illegal to Buy Services". But the article Nordic_model is completely unrelated. Somebody needs to make an article by that name to explain the concept. OsamaBinLogin ( talk) 05:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC)