This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
this article should indeed be at least as long and in-depth as the Internationalism article, if not more so. 71.255.215.157 17:41, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Added an Internationalist website for people who want to see more info.
PJB 18:39, 23 February 2006 (UTC) ( Talkin' to me?) My view is that ONLY Socialism can be internationalist. Bourgeois internatioanlism is a fiction. The bourgeoisie, of course, wants to exapnd beyond national borders- hence "globalization". But, AT THE SAME TIME, the bourgeoisie NEEDS NATIONALISM, in order to fight against competition from other foreign capitalists, and, of course, in order to divide the working class along national lines. RaduFlorian 09:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
The following is from the article about Fidel Castro:
For comparison, the following is from the article about Nelson Mandela:
These quotes may not be from the same decade, but I think they show Mandela's view. It seems that what is important to him is not in fact that UN approves military action, but that the military action is comitted for socialism.
Has no-one dared to call the "proletarian internationalism" for "socialist imperialism", or would it be wrong? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehasl ( talk • contribs) 21:29, 29 April 2008
Do not confound Marxist theory with soviet practice
I think it would be interesting at least to link the article to the Cuban participation in SA and also the International Brigades in the Spanish Civil War —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erioluk ( talk • contribs) 15:40, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Socialist internationalism was the main implementation of the Proletarian internationalism, so it is important to this article. Xx236 ( talk) 09:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
this article should indeed be at least as long and in-depth as the Internationalism article, if not more so. 71.255.215.157 17:41, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Added an Internationalist website for people who want to see more info.
PJB 18:39, 23 February 2006 (UTC) ( Talkin' to me?) My view is that ONLY Socialism can be internationalist. Bourgeois internatioanlism is a fiction. The bourgeoisie, of course, wants to exapnd beyond national borders- hence "globalization". But, AT THE SAME TIME, the bourgeoisie NEEDS NATIONALISM, in order to fight against competition from other foreign capitalists, and, of course, in order to divide the working class along national lines. RaduFlorian 09:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
The following is from the article about Fidel Castro:
For comparison, the following is from the article about Nelson Mandela:
These quotes may not be from the same decade, but I think they show Mandela's view. It seems that what is important to him is not in fact that UN approves military action, but that the military action is comitted for socialism.
Has no-one dared to call the "proletarian internationalism" for "socialist imperialism", or would it be wrong? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehasl ( talk • contribs) 21:29, 29 April 2008
Do not confound Marxist theory with soviet practice
I think it would be interesting at least to link the article to the Cuban participation in SA and also the International Brigades in the Spanish Civil War —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erioluk ( talk • contribs) 15:40, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Socialist internationalism was the main implementation of the Proletarian internationalism, so it is important to this article. Xx236 ( talk) 09:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)