From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

P&G's satanic issues

The way that Amway was very nonsense to P&G, the 1930 logo was very satanic. Apollo C. Quiboloy fans ( talk) 02:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC) reply

"the 1930 logo was very satanic".
How? -- Rhombuth ( talk) 13:37, 29 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Pay ratio -- add to info box

I would like to see the pay ratio, and possibly associated data like median pay and CEO pay added to the infobox. I have mentioned this article where I requested a "pay ratio" parameter be added to the infobox for that purpose: Template_talk:Infobox_company#Pay_ratio. -- David Tornheim ( talk) 13:39, 28 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Failure to Maintain an Impartial Tone

The section Toxic shock syndrome and tampons references facts and makes claims that are related to the subject matter, but are not pertinent to addressing the controversy. Their use in the section is reminiscent of a corporate statement, not an objective encyclopedia article. This is my first comment in a long time, I apologize for not knowing the proper flags. Thanks! L. -- Logzzen ( talk) 08:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Is the carbon footprint section just marketing?

The section about the companies carbon foot print is very short, and only cites sources directly written by P&G.

Is it really important information or just marketing non-sense? 2A02:810B:C040:1DF4:C074:BFC2:1572:9F31 ( talk) 21:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Interestingly, it was added by a short-term editor who added carbon footprint info to dozens of corporate pages; I guess that was their area of interest. On one hand, it could be argued that it isn't significant enough to include if independent sources haven't noted it. On the other, it could be argued that it's basic corporate information that readers these days might expect to find in an article. I don't have an opinion either way, actually. Schazjmd  (talk) 22:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC) reply

List of brands

No mention of the brands owned by this company? MightyArms ( talk) 14:43, 24 September 2022 (UTC) reply

List of Procter & Gamble brands Schazjmd  (talk) 15:13, 24 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Wiki Education assignment: First Year English Composition 1001

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2023 and 30 November 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CheyenneGreen ( article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by CheyenneGreen ( talk) 15:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC) reply

p&g has another cleaning company

why is there no febreze in this article but just the companies list? Best writer and typer ( talk) 01:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

P&G's satanic issues

The way that Amway was very nonsense to P&G, the 1930 logo was very satanic. Apollo C. Quiboloy fans ( talk) 02:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC) reply

"the 1930 logo was very satanic".
How? -- Rhombuth ( talk) 13:37, 29 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Pay ratio -- add to info box

I would like to see the pay ratio, and possibly associated data like median pay and CEO pay added to the infobox. I have mentioned this article where I requested a "pay ratio" parameter be added to the infobox for that purpose: Template_talk:Infobox_company#Pay_ratio. -- David Tornheim ( talk) 13:39, 28 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Failure to Maintain an Impartial Tone

The section Toxic shock syndrome and tampons references facts and makes claims that are related to the subject matter, but are not pertinent to addressing the controversy. Their use in the section is reminiscent of a corporate statement, not an objective encyclopedia article. This is my first comment in a long time, I apologize for not knowing the proper flags. Thanks! L. -- Logzzen ( talk) 08:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Is the carbon footprint section just marketing?

The section about the companies carbon foot print is very short, and only cites sources directly written by P&G.

Is it really important information or just marketing non-sense? 2A02:810B:C040:1DF4:C074:BFC2:1572:9F31 ( talk) 21:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Interestingly, it was added by a short-term editor who added carbon footprint info to dozens of corporate pages; I guess that was their area of interest. On one hand, it could be argued that it isn't significant enough to include if independent sources haven't noted it. On the other, it could be argued that it's basic corporate information that readers these days might expect to find in an article. I don't have an opinion either way, actually. Schazjmd  (talk) 22:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC) reply

List of brands

No mention of the brands owned by this company? MightyArms ( talk) 14:43, 24 September 2022 (UTC) reply

List of Procter & Gamble brands Schazjmd  (talk) 15:13, 24 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Wiki Education assignment: First Year English Composition 1001

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2023 and 30 November 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CheyenneGreen ( article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by CheyenneGreen ( talk) 15:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC) reply

p&g has another cleaning company

why is there no febreze in this article but just the companies list? Best writer and typer ( talk) 01:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook